Abstract:The thesis of this paper is that certain nonhuman animals could be conceived of as capable of moral motivation and subsequent moral behavior, with the appropriate behavioral, psychological and cognitive evidence. I argue that a certain notion of morality—morality as the process of conscious, reasoned deliberation over explicit moral concepts—is excessively exclusionary, and that such a notion describes one mode of moral cognition, but not, as others have argued, morality’s essence. Instead, morality and moral behaviors could be viewed as natural phenomena that arose as a means by which social species could better cohere and survive, and one that consists of a spectrum of behaviors. Ultimately, I argue that the aforementioned notion of moral cognition has unfairly worked to exclude (certain) nonhuman animals from the sphere of morality as beings capable of moral behavior, and that instead we should be looking at moral behavior as a function of what I call ‘moral responsiveness.’
Moral Responsiveness and Nonhuman Animals: A Challenge to Kantian Morality
Published 2019 in Ethics and the Environment
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2019
- Venue
Ethics and the Environment
- Publication date
2019-05-29
- Fields of study
Sociology, Philosophy
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-48 of 48 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-3 of 3 citing papers · Page 1 of 1