Is the Quantification of Mental Stress Possible

K. Hori

Published 2017 in Unknown venue

ABSTRACT

In this context, we proposed the hypothesis of endogenous appearance of AA in AD and LBD [1,2]. In AD, when down regulation of acetylcholine (ACh) reaches the critical level, the inflammatory system is up regulated and cytokines with AA appears endogenously [1]. In case of LBD, although down regulation of Ach dosen’t reach the critical level, the other AA insert such as mental stress (hyper activation of HPA axis) is added and inflammatory system is also up regulated and cytokines with AA appears endogenously [2]. However, even in the later cases the down regulation of ACh. is essential for the appearance of AA. If the cholinergic system is intact, the up regulation of this system is possible, which can compensate this up regulated HPA axis and doesn’t allow to up regulate the inflammatory system [3]. We speculate that this mechanism is “the overcome the mental stress”. In fact, when the stress is added, sickness behaviors occur [4]. We also speculate this sickness behaviors are related with the up regulation of AC hand that these sickness behaviors appear as the compensatory mechanisms of mental stress. In in this context persons with deteriorated ACh and system mental stress should be avoided. However, overcome of the mental stress is needed in order to development of brain nervous system in healthy persons those their cholinergic systems are intact [5,6]. Moreover, not only pharmacological treatment but also non pharmacological treatment is effective the ameliorations of mental stresses [7]. These two conditions (the over activated inflammatory state and hypoactivity of ACh as compensatory mechanism) are similar with each other. Can we distinguish between this right situation and wrong situation? In “right situation”, the cholinergic system is up regulated in order not to upregulate the inflammatory system for coping of mental stress. On the contrary to this, in “wrong situation”, the cholinergic system is not enough up regulated in order not to up regulate the inflammatory system for coping of mental stress. Of course, in this “wrong situation”, the inflammatory system is over activated. From these, we consider that some inflammatory markers can distinguish between these two situations. Among these, we propose the serum anticholinergic activity (SAA). SAA is peripheral marker of anticholinergic burden, which is related with inflammation. Therefore, we consider SAA as an inflammatory marker in peripheral system. Although as peripherally evaluated, SAA is reflect the inflammatory system in the central nervous system because inflammation in peripheral tissue and that in central nervous system are connected. When the mental stress is added and SAA is negative, the person is in “right situation”, we should conduct the nonpharmacological therapy in order to offer the enrich environment. When the mental stress is added and SAA is positive, the person is in “wrong situation”, we should prescribe the cholinesterase inhibitor as pharmacological therapy in order to abolish AA.

PUBLICATION RECORD

CITATION MAP

EXTRACTION MAP

CLAIMS

  • No claims are published for this paper.

CONCEPTS

  • No concepts are published for this paper.

CITED BY

  • No citing papers are available for this paper.

Showing 0-0 of 0 citing papers · Page 1 of 1