BACKGROUND Recently, a new risk model was developed, namely hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) risk for cerebrovascular accident, for estimating the risk of thromboembolism (TE) in patients with HCM. There is no study about the external validation of this model. METHODS We evaluated the performance of the model for predicting TE in 417 patients with HCM recruited between 2008 and 2016, from a tertiary referral centre. The primary end point was 5-year TE, and the risk was calculated using the model formula. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 3.5 years, 25 (6.0%) patients reached the TE end point, and 22 (5.3%) patients within the first 5 years. Within a 5-year time frame, the model showed a possibly helpful discrimination for TE (C-index for the whole cohort: 0.67, C-index for the subgroup without atrial fibrillation: 0.67) relative to its original C-index of 0.75. However, the calibration was not perfect, which suggested that there was an underestimation of 5-year TE risk in the whole cohort and different risk groups. CONCLUSIONS HCM risk for cerebrovascular accident demonstrated a possibly helpful discrimination for TE when applied in a new set of patients with HCM. However, the accurate estimation of absolute risk should be explored in future studies.
External Validation of the Model of Thromboembolic Risk in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients.
Sen He,Ziqiong Wang,T. Cheem,H. Liao,Xiaoping Chen,Yong He
Published 2019 in Canadian Journal of Cardiology
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2019
- Venue
Canadian Journal of Cardiology
- Publication date
2019-12-01
- Fields of study
Medicine
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-23 of 23 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-17 of 17 citing papers · Page 1 of 1