The competition diallel and the exploitation and interference components of larval competition in Drosophila melanogaster

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  1991

• Venue

  Heredity

• Publication date

  1991-06-01

• Fields of study

  Biology, Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1038/hdy.1991.42PMID 1908839
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• An alternative approach to the analysis of mixed cropping experiments. 2. Marketable yield

  2008cited by this paper
• A dynamic growth model of vegetative soya bean plants: model structure and behaviour under varying root temperature and nitrogen concentration.

  1990cited by this paper
• The three C's — competition, coexistence and coevolution — and their impact on the breeding of forage crop mixtures

  1990cited by this paper
• Analysis of dominance for competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster

  1989cited by this paper
• Modelling Photosynthesis in Monocultures and Mixtures

  1989cited by this paper
• Competition between maize and Echinochloa crus-galli analysed by a hyperbolic regression model.

  1989cited by this paper
• A single equation to quantify the hierarchy in plant size induced by competition within monocultures

  1988cited by this paper
• Competitive interactions in Drosophila melanogaster: recurrent selection for aggression and response

  1988cited by this paper
• Larval competition in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Estimation of larval growth parameters

  1988cited by this paper
• Genetic analysis of larval competition in Drosophila melanogaster

  1988cited by this paper
• Competitive interactions in Drosophila melanogaster: genetic variation for interference through media conditioning

  1988cited by this paper
• Larval competition in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Comparing biological and competitive parameters

  1988cited by this paper
• A comparison of substitution and addition designs for the analysis of competitive interactions in Drosophila melanogaster

  1987cited by this paper
• Variation for aggression and response in the competitive interactions of Drosophila melanogaster

  1985cited by this paper
• Competition Within Stands of Picea sitchensis and Pinus contorta

  1984cited by this paper
• An alternative approach to the analysis of mixed cropping experiments. I. Estimation of competition effects

  1983cited by this paper
• Sex Differences in Larval Competition in Drosophila melanogaster: The Testing of a Competition Model and Its Relevance to Frequency-Dependent Selection

  1983cited by this paper
• Simulation of competition for light and water in crop-weed associations

  1983cited by this paper
• Pressure and response in competitive interactions

  1983cited by this paper
• Growth and Yield in Pure and Mixed Crops of Potato Cultivars

  1982cited by this paper
• Drosophila larval foraging behavior: Digging

  1982cited by this paper
• The effect of root mass of perennial rye grass lolium perenne on the competitive ability with respect to couch grass elytrigia repens

  1982cited by this paper
• Analysis of competitive ability among genotypes of perennial ryegrass

  1982cited by this paper
• Competition for Light in a Plant Monoculture Modelled as a Spatial Stochastic Process

  1981cited by this paper
• Competitive interactions in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Measurement of competition

  1981cited by this paper
• The analysis of yield-density relationships in binary mixtures using inverse polynomials

  1981cited by this paper
• Competitive interactions in Drosophila melanogaster III. Triocultures

  1980cited by this paper
• Selection for digging behavior inDrosophila melanogaster larvae

  1978cited by this paper
• Inter- and intrapopulational variation in digging inDrosophila melanogaster larvae

  1977cited by this paper
• EFFECTS OF LARVAL BIOTIC RESIDUES ON VIABILITY IN FOUR SPECIES OF DROSOPHILA

  1975cited by this paper
• Genetic analysis of larval feeding behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster.

  1974cited by this paper
• Regression analysis of interactions between competing species

  1973cited by this paper
• Studies on mixtures of maize and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with particular reference to plant population

  1972cited by this paper
• A revised analysis of plant competition experiments.

  1971cited by this paper
• Variation for metrical characters in Drosophila populations III. The nature of selection

  1971cited by this paper
• The effect of larval interaction on viability in Drosophila melanogaster. 3. Effects of biotic residues.

  1969cited by this paper
• An analysis of yields of grasses in mixed and pure stands

  1968cited by this paper
• Selection for Rate of Growth and Its Influence On Competitive Ability of Larvae of Drosophila Melanogaster

  1968cited by this paper
• An analysis of yields of grasses in mixed and pure stands

  1968cited by this paper
• Diallel analysis of competition between grass species

  1968cited by this paper
• Genetic variations of Drosophila melanogaster

  1967cited by this paper
• STATISTICAL METHODS

  1967cited by this paper
• A Darwinian Approach to Plant Ecology

  1967cited by this paper
• Genotypic interactions among competing strains and species of Drosophila.

  1966cited by this paper
• Competition between herbage plants

  1965cited by this paper
• Analysis of Competition Experiments

  1965cited by this paper
• THE EFFECT OF LARVAL INTERACTION OF VIABILITY IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. I. CHANGES IN HETEROZYGOSITY.

  1964cited by this paper
• An Analysis of Factors Which Determine Success in Competition for Food Among Larvae of Drosophila Melanogaster

  1962cited by this paper
• Statistical methods in research and production

  1958cited by this paper
• The Meanings of Competition

  1957cited by this paper
• The Ecological Determinants of Population Growth in a Drosophila Culture. III. Larval and Pupal Survival

  1949cited by this paper
• Growth and variation of the larvae of Drosophila melanogaster

  1929cited by this paper
• The effect of root mass of perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne L.) on the competitive ability with respect to couchgrass ( Elytrigia repens (L.) Desv.)

  year unknowncited by this paper

• The evolution of competitive effectiveness and tolerance in populations of Drosophila melanogaster adapted to chronic larval crowding at varying combinations of egg number and food volume

  2023cites this paper
• Drosophila Infestations of California Strawberries and Identification of Drosophila suzukii Using a TaqMan Assay

  2023cites this paper
• An individual-based simulation framework exploring the ecology and mechanistic underpinnings of larval crowding in laboratory populations of Drosophila

  2023cites this paper
• More than just density: the role of egg number, food volume and container dimensions in mediating larval competition in Drosophila melanogaster

  2023cites this paper
• Two Decades of Drosophila Population Dynamics: Modeling, Experiments, and Implications

  2018cites this paper
• Genotype‐by‐Environment Interactions when the Social Environment Contains Genes

  2014cites this paper
• The Maintenance of Heritable Variation Through Social Competition

  2008cites this paper
• The capture of heritable variation for genetic quality through social competition

  2008influential citation
• Genetic architecture and evolutionary constraint when the environment contains genes

  2003cites this paper
• ABILITY IN TWO COMPETING SPECIES OF DROSOPHILA

  1995cites this paper
• ALTERNATIVE ROUTES TO THE EVOLUTION OF COMPETITIVE ABILITY IN TWO COMPETING SPECIES OF DROSOPHILA

  1995cites this paper