"In-House Likeness": Comparison of Large Compound Collections Using Artificial Neural Networks

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2005

• Venue

  Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

• Publication date

  2005-05-06

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Chemistry, Computer Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1021/ci049702oPMID 16045282
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• ZINC - A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening

  2005cited by this paper
• Artificial Neural Networks and Linear Discriminant Analysis: A Valuable Combination in the Selection of New Antibacterial Compounds

  2004cited by this paper
• Prediction of biological targets using probabilistic neural networks and atom-type descriptors.

  2004cited by this paper
• Design of a compound screening collection for use in high throughput screening.

  2004cited by this paper
• Drugs and Nondrugs: An Effective Discrimination with Topological Methods and Artificial Neural Networks

  2003cited by this paper
• Structure-Based versus Property-Based Approaches in the Design of G-Protein-Coupled Receptor-Targeted Libraries

  2003cited by this paper
• Prediction of CNS Activity of Compound Libraries Using Substructure Analysis

  2003cited by this paper
• New Diversity Calculations Algorithms Used for Compound Selection

  2002cited by this paper
• An overview of the diversity represented in commercially-available databases

  2002cited by this paper
• Classification scheme for the design of serine protease targeted compound libraries

  2002cited by this paper
• Property-Based Design of GPCR-Targeted Library

  2002cited by this paper
• Novel algorithms for the optimization of molecular diversity of combinatorial libraries.

  2000cited by this paper
• Improving the Odds in Discriminating "Drug-like" from "Non Drug-like" Compounds

  2000cited by this paper
• Can we learn to distinguish between "drug-like" and "nondrug-like" molecules?

  1998cited by this paper
• A scoring scheme for discriminating between drugs and nondrugs.

  1998cited by this paper

• Comparative analyses of structural features and scaffold diversity for purchasable compound libraries

  2017cites this paper
• Ligand biological activity predictions using fingerprint-based artificial neural networks (FANN-QSAR).

  2015cites this paper
• Molecular fingerprint-based artificial neural networks QSAR for ligand biological activity predictions.

  2012cites this paper
• QSAR METHODS DEVELOPMENT, VIRTUAL AND EXPERIMENTAL SCREENING FOR CANNABINOID LIGAND DISCOVERY

  2012cites this paper
• Rendezvous in chemical space? Comparing the small molecule compound libraries of Bayer and Schering.

  2011cites this paper
• De novo design: balancing novelty and confined chemical space

  2010cites this paper
• Drug Design with Artificial Neural Networks

  2009cites this paper
• FOG: Fragment Optimized Growth Algorithm for the de Novo Generation of Molecules Occupying Druglike Chemical Space

  2009cites this paper
• Dissimilarity-based approaches to compound acquisition.

  2008cites this paper
• Complementarity between public and commercial databases: new opportunities in medicinal chemistry informatics.

  2007cites this paper
• Properties Guiding Drug‐ and Lead‐Likeness

  2007cites this paper
• Lessons Learnt from Assembling Screening Libraries for Drug Discovery for Neglected Diseases

  2007cites this paper
• Feature vs. classifier fusion for predictive data mining a case study in pesticide classification

  2007cites this paper
• Predictive model based on artificial neural net for purity of perovskite-type SrTiO3 nanocrystalline

  2006cites this paper
• Similarity Metrics and Descriptor Spaces – Which Combinations to Choose?

  2006cites this paper
• Chapter 9 Molecular Similarity: Advances in Methods, Applications and Validations in Virtual Screening and QSAR

  2006cites this paper