Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2010

• Venue

  Brain Research

• Publication date

  2010-04-14

• Fields of study

  Biology, Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.02.040PMID 20170647
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Preattentive visual change detection as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN)--evidence for a memory-based process.

  2009cited by this paper
• Unnoticed regularity violation elicits change-related brain activity.

  2009cited by this paper
• Involvement of memory-comparison-based change detection in visual distraction.

  2008cited by this paper
• Sensory and Association Cortex in Time Perception

  2008cited by this paper
• The Role of Superior Temporal Cortex in Auditory Timing

  2008cited by this paper
• Attention switching function of memory-comparison-based change detection system in the visual modality.

  2008cited by this paper
• The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review.

  2007cited by this paper
• Interpreting the Mismatch Negativity

  2007cited by this paper
• How emotions colour our perception of time.

  2007cited by this paper
• Visual mismatch negativity: Violation of nonattended environmental regularities

  2007cited by this paper
• The failure of Weber's law in time perception and production.

  2006cited by this paper
• Independent processing of visual stimulus changes in ventral and dorsal stream features indexed by an early positive difference in event-related brain potentials.

  2006cited by this paper
• Probability-independent and -dependent ERPs reflecting visual change detection.

  2006cited by this paper
• When do auditory/visual differences in duration judgements occur?

  2006cited by this paper
• Mechanisms for detecting auditory temporal and spectral deviations operate over similar time windows but are divided differently between the two hemispheres

  2006cited by this paper
• Visual temporal window of integration as revealed by the visual mismatch negativity event-related potential to stimulus omissions.

  2006cited by this paper
• What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing

  2005cited by this paper
• Neural correlates of preattentive and attentive processing of visual changes

  2005cited by this paper
• Les effets de la modalité sensorielle sur la perception du temps

  2005cited by this paper
• Memory-based or afferent processes in mismatch negativity (MMN): a review of the evidence.

  2005cited by this paper
• Functional characterization of mismatch negativity to a visual stimulus.

  2005cited by this paper
• Interval-timing deficits in individuals at high risk for schizophrenia.

  2005cited by this paper
• Positive difference in ERPs reflects independent processing of visual changes.

  2005cited by this paper
• EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis.

  2004cited by this paper
• What is common to brain activity evoked by the perception of visual and auditory filled durations? A study with MEG and EEG co-recordings.

  2004cited by this paper
• Visual change detection: event-related potentials are dependent on stimulus location in humans.

  2004cited by this paper
• Functional Anatomy of the Attentional Modulation of Time Estimation

  2004cited by this paper
• Automatic time perception in the human brain for intervals ranging from milliseconds to seconds.

  2004cited by this paper
• Differential processing of duration changes within short and long sounds in humans.

  2004cited by this paper
• Distinct systems for automatic and cognitively controlled time measurement: evidence from neuroimaging.

  2003cited by this paper
• Event-related potentials evoked by multi-feature conflict under different attentive conditions

  2003cited by this paper
• Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing

  2003cited by this paper
• Measuring duration mismatch negativity.

  2003cited by this paper
• Brain activation patterns during measurement of sub- and supra-second intervals.

  2003cited by this paper
• Event-related potentials reveal involuntary processing of orientation changes in the visual modality.

  2003cited by this paper
• Preattentive Memory-Based Comparison of Sound Intensity

  2003cited by this paper
• MMN in the visual modality: a review.

  2003cited by this paper
• Modality differences in interval timing: Attention, clock speed, and memory.

  2003cited by this paper
• A modified oddball paradigm "cross-modal delayed response" and the research on mismatch negativity.

  2002cited by this paper
• Memory-based detection of task-irrelevant visual changes.

  2002cited by this paper
• Paying Attention to Time as one Gets Older

  2001cited by this paper
• Is there pre-attentive memory-based comparison of pitch?

  2001cited by this paper
• Simultaneously active pre-attentive representations of local and global rules for sound sequences in the human brain.

  2001cited by this paper
• Preattentive extraction of abstract feature conjunctions from auditory stimulation as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN).

  2001cited by this paper
• Differential effects of auditory and visual signals on clock speed and temporal memory.

  2000cited by this paper
• Mismatch negativity and behavioural discrimination in humans as a function of the magnitude of change in sound duration.

  2000cited by this paper
• Attentional capture and inattentional blindness.

  2000cited by this paper
• The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience.

  1999cited by this paper
• Cross-modal selective attention to visual and auditory stimuli modulates endogenous ERP components.

  1999cited by this paper
• The influence of the scalar timing model on human timing research.

  1998cited by this paper
• Why “Sounds Are Judged Longer than Lights”: Application of a Model of the Internal Clock in Humans

  1998cited by this paper
• Mismatch negativity of ERP in cross-modal attention

  1997cited by this paper
• Mismatch response of the human brain to changes in sound location

  1996cited by this paper
• Processing of auditory stimuli during auditory and visual attention as revealed by event-related potentials.

  1994cited by this paper
• Brain indices of automatic pattern processing

  1994cited by this paper
• Attention and mismatch negativity.

  1993cited by this paper
• Event-related potentials reveal a memory trace for temporal features.

  1993cited by this paper
• Intermodal selective attention. I. Effects on event-related potentials to lateralized auditory and visual stimuli.

  1992cited by this paper
• Intermodal selective attention. II. Effects of attentional load on processing of auditory and visual stimuli in central space.

  1992cited by this paper
• Origins of scalar timing

  1991cited by this paper
• The effects of channel-selective attention on the mismatch negativity wave elicited by deviant tones.

  1991cited by this paper
• Do event-related potentials to infrequent decrements in duration of auditory stimuli demonstrate a memory trace in man?

  1989cited by this paper
• Reactions of human auditory cortex to a change in tone duration.

  1989cited by this paper
• Frequency and location specificity of the human vertex N1 wave.

  1988cited by this paper
• Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials.

  1985cited by this paper
• Attentional Bias between Modalities: Effect on the Internal Clock, Memory, and Decision Stages Used in Animal Time Discrimination a

  1984cited by this paper
• Processing negativity: an evoked-potential reflection of selective attention.

  1982cited by this paper
• Early selective-attention effects on the evoked potential: a critical review and reinterpretation.

  1979cited by this paper
• Human auditory sustained potentials. II. Stimulus relationships.

  1978cited by this paper
• Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted.

  1978cited by this paper
• Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing.

  1977cited by this paper
• Studies of Auditory-Visual Differences in Human Time Judgment: 1. Sounds are Judged Longer than Lights

  1974cited by this paper
• Stimulus repetition rate factors which influence the auditory evoked potential in man.

  1969cited by this paper

• Perception of short, but not long, time intervals is modality specific: EEG evidence using vibrotactile stimuli

  2025cites this paper
• Predicting the unpredicted … brain response: A systematic review of the feature-related visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) and the experimental parameters that affect it

  2025cites this paper
• Predicting an EEG-Based hypnotic time estimation with non-linear kernels of support vector machine algorithm

  2024cites this paper
• Frequency-specific contributions to auditory perceptual priors: Testing the predictive-coding hypothesis

  2024cites this paper
• Temporal context modulates cross-modality time discrimination: Electrophysiological evidence for supramodal temporal representation.

  2024cites this paper
• The speed and temporal frequency of visual apparent motion modulate auditory duration perception

  2023cites this paper
• Early frequency-specific contributions to serial-effects in audition

  2023cites this paper
• Attention is required for canonical brain signature of prediction error despite early encoding of the stimuli

  2023cites this paper
• No Brain Signature of Prediction Error to Unattended Visual Stimuli Despite Early Brain Encoding of the Stimuli

  2022cites this paper
• NO VMMN TO UNATTENDED ORIENTATION DEVIANT 1 Unattended visual stimuli do not produce prediction error responses despite being initially encoded

  2022cites this paper
• The effect of neurofeedback training combined with computer cognitive games on the time perception, attention, and working memory in children with ADHD

  2022cites this paper
• The Neural Responses of Visual Complexity in the Oddball Paradigm: An ERP Study

  2022cites this paper
• Disentangling the percepts of illusory movement and sensory stimulation during tendon vibration in the EEG

  2021cites this paper
• Algorithm-Based Practice Schedule and Task Similarity Enhance Motor Learning in Older Adults

  2020cites this paper
• The quest for the genuine visual mismatch negativity (vMMN): Event-related potential indications of deviance detection for low-level visual features.

  2020cites this paper
• Visual processing in the human brain: Investigating deviance detection from a predictive coding perspective

  2019influential citation
• Clear Evidence for Electrophysiological Signatures of Duration and Rhythm Prediction, but not across Sensory Modalities

  2019cites this paper
• Cerebral Evoked Potentials in Patients at an Early Stage of Schizophrenia

  2018cites this paper
• Automatic detection of the duration of visual static and dynamic stimuli.

  2018cites this paper
• The Temporal Dynamic Relationship Between Attention and Crowding: Electrophysiological Evidence From an Event-Related Potential Study

  2018cites this paper
• Still no Evidence for Sustained Effects of Multisensory Integration of Duration.

  2018cites this paper
• Commentary: Experience Sampling Methodology reveals similarities in the experience of passage of time in young and elderly adults

  2017cites this paper
• Neurophysiological signatures of duration and rhythm prediction across sensory modalities

  2017influential citation
• Commentary: Experience Sampling Methodology reveals similarities in the experience of passage of time in young and elderly adults

  2017cites this paper
• Gender differences in pre-attentive change detection for visual but not auditory stimuli.

  2016cites this paper
• The impact of a concurrent motor task on auditory and visual temporal discrimination tasks

  2016cites this paper
• Human error and response to alarms in process safety

  2016cites this paper
• Effect of mental fatigue on nonattention: a visual mismatch negativity study

  2016cites this paper
• determined by stimulus saliency, not absolute novelty Novelty is not enough: laser-evoked potentials are

  2015cites this paper
• Effectiveness of a computer-based time perception training on temporal processing precision

  2014cites this paper
• Comparison of auditory and visual oddball fMRI in schizophrenia.

  2014cites this paper
• Shared and distinct factors driving attention and temporal processing across modalities.

  2014cites this paper
• Visual mismatch negativity: a predictive coding view

  2014cites this paper
• The effects of type of interval, sensory modality, base duration, and psychophysical task on the discrimination of brief time intervals

  2014cites this paper
• Probing interval timing with scalp-recorded electroencephalography (EEG).

  2014cites this paper
• Early auditory change detection implicitly facilitated by ignored concurrent visual change during a Braille reading task.

  2013cites this paper
• Sub-second temporal processing : effects of modality and spatial change on brief visual and auditory time judgments

  2013cites this paper
• Novelty is not enough: laser-evoked potentials are determined by stimulus saliency, not absolute novelty.

  2013cites this paper
• Unattended and attended visual change detection of motion as indexed by event-related potentials and its behavioral correlates

  2013cites this paper
• Auditory and visual temporal sensitivity: evidence for a hierarchical structure of modality-specific and modality-independent levels of temporal information processing

  2012cites this paper
• Impairment in processing visual information at the pre-attentive stage in patients with a major depressive disorder: a visual mismatch negativity study.

  2011cites this paper
• Compression of time during smooth pursuit eye movements.

  2010cites this paper
• New Perspectives on Vierordt's Law: Memory-Mixing in Ordinal Temporal Comparison Tasks

  2010cites this paper