The yeast DNA damage checkpoint proteins control a cytoplasmic response to DNA damage

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2007

• Venue

  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

• Publication date

  2007-07-03

• Fields of study

  Biology, Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1073/pnas.0609636104PMID 17586685PMCID PMC1896138
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• An FHA domain–mediated protein interaction network of Rad53 reveals its role in polarized cell growth

  2006cited by this paper
• Yeast G1 DNA damage checkpoint regulation by H2A phosphorylation is independent of chromatin remodeling

  2006cited by this paper
• Surviving the breakup: the DNA damage checkpoint.

  2006cited by this paper
• Checkpoint proteins control morphogenetic events during DNA replication stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

  2006cited by this paper
• Molecular architecture of a kinetochore–microtubule attachment site

  2006cited by this paper
• Downregulation of PP2A(Cdc55) phosphatase by separase initiates mitotic exit in budding yeast.

  2006cited by this paper
• Dynamic Changes in Protein-Protein Interaction and Protein Phosphorylation Probed with Amine-reactive Isotope Tag*S

  2005cited by this paper
• The many phases of anaphase.

  2005cited by this paper
• Function of Rad17/Mec3/Ddc1 and its partial complexes in the DNA damage checkpoint.

  2005cited by this paper
• The DNA damage response: sensing and signaling.

  2004cited by this paper
• DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1

  2004cited by this paper
• ATM–the first step in helping cells deal with DNA damage☆

  2004cited by this paper
• Remodelling the Rad9 Checkpoint Complex: Preparing Rad53 for Action

  2004cited by this paper
• Sensing DNA Damage Through ATRIP Recognition of RPA-ssDNA Complexes

  2003cited by this paper
• PP2C phosphatases Ptc2 and Ptc3 are required for DNA checkpoint inactivation after a double-strand break.

  2003cited by this paper
• Yeast kinetochores do not stabilize Stu2p-dependent spindle microtubule dynamics.

  2003cited by this paper
• Human Chk1 expression is dispensable for somatic cell death and critical for sustaining G2 DNA damage checkpoint.

  2003cited by this paper
• Two Distinct Pathways for Inhibiting Pds1 Ubiquitination in Response to DNA Damage*

  2003cited by this paper
• The mitotic exit network.

  2003cited by this paper
• Yeast Rad17/Mec3/Ddc1: A sliding clamp for the DNA damage checkpoint

  2003cited by this paper
• Overlapping roles of the spindle assembly and DNA damage checkpoints in the cell-cycle response to altered chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

  2002cited by this paper
• Regulation of ATR substrate selection by Rad17-dependent loading of Rad9 complexes onto chromatin.

  2002cited by this paper
• Spindle Polarity in S. cerevisiae: MEN Can Tell

  2002cited by this paper
• Lcd1p recruits Mec1p to DNA lesions in vitro and in vivo.

  2002cited by this paper
• Clamp and clamp loader structures of the human checkpoint protein complexes, Rad9‐1‐1 and Rad17‐RFC

  2002cited by this paper
• The Dun1 checkpoint kinase phosphorylates and regulates the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1

  2002cited by this paper
• Regulation of Saccharomyces Rad53 checkpoint kinase during adaptation from DNA damage-induced G2/M arrest.

  2001cited by this paper
• Budding Yeast Chromosome Structure and Dynamics during Mitosis

  2001cited by this paper
• A Novel Role of the Budding Yeast Separin Esp1 in Anaphase Spindle Elongation

  2001cited by this paper
• Nuclear migration: cortical anchors for cytoplasmic dynein.

  2001cited by this paper
• Recruitment of Mec1 and Ddc1 Checkpoint Proteins to Double-Strand Breaks Through Distinct Mechanisms

  2001cited by this paper
• Role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad9 protein in sensing and responding to DNA damage.

  2001cited by this paper
• Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo.

  2001cited by this paper
• The DNA damage checkpoint signal in budding yeast is nuclear limited.

  2000cited by this paper
• The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective

  2000cited by this paper
• Establishing biorientation occurs with precocious separation of the sister kinetochores, but not the arms, in the early spindle of budding yeast.

  2000cited by this paper
• Arrest, adaptation, and recovery following a chromosome double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

  2000cited by this paper
• Dynamic positioning of mitotic spindles in yeast: role of microtubule motors and cortical determinants.

  2000cited by this paper
• Transient sister chromatid separation and elastic deformation of chromosomes during mitosis in budding yeast.

  2000cited by this paper
• Sensing and responding to DNA damage.

  2000cited by this paper
• Cohesin ensures bipolar attachment of microtubules to sister centromeres and resists their precocious separation

  2000cited by this paper
• Cell cycle progression in the presence of irreparable DNA damage is controlled by a Mec1‐ and Rad53‐dependent checkpoint in budding yeast

  1999cited by this paper
• Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms.

  1999cited by this paper
• Heterologous URA3MX cassettes for gene replacement in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

  1999cited by this paper
• RAD53, DUN1 and PDS1 define two parallel G2/M checkpoint pathways in budding yeast

  1999cited by this paper
• Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage.

  1998cited by this paper
• A high-resolution multimode digital microscope system.

  1998cited by this paper
• CDC5 and CKII control adaptation to the yeast DNA damage checkpoint.

  1997cited by this paper
• Imaging green fluorescent protein fusion proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

  1997cited by this paper
• Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

  1996cited by this paper
• Spindle dynamics and cell cycle regulation of dynein in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae

  1995cited by this paper
• New heterologous modules for classical or PCR‐based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

  1994cited by this paper
• Heat-inducible degron: a method for constructing temperature-sensitive mutants.

  1994cited by this paper
• Disruption of mitotic spindle orientation in a yeast dynein mutant.

  1993cited by this paper
• Loss of a yeast telomere: arrest, recovery, and chromosome loss.

  1993cited by this paper
• The dynamics of chromosome movement in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

  1989cited by this paper

• Engineering recombination machinery facilitates the construction of yeast cell factories

  2025cites this paper
• Safeguarding genome integrity: Polo-like kinase Cdc5 and phosphatase Cdc14 orchestrate Topoisomerase II-mediated catenane resolution in mitosis

  2025cites this paper
• Extended DNA damage-induced G2/M arrests lead to aberrant mitoses and cell death due to excessive accumulation of securin

  2025cites this paper
• Nonrepair functions of DNA mismatch repair proteins: new avenues for precision oncology.

  2024cites this paper
• Prolonged cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage in yeast requires the maintenance of DNA damage signaling and the spindle assembly checkpoint

  2023cites this paper
• The vacuole shapes the nucleus and the ribosomal DNA loop during mitotic delays

  2022cites this paper
• The Polo kinase Cdc5 is regulated at multiple levels in the adaptation response to telomere dysfunction

  2021cites this paper
• Nuclear envelope reshaping around the vacuole determines the morphology of the ribosomal DNA

  2021cites this paper
• Checkpoint Responses to DNA Double-Strand Breaks.

  2020cites this paper
• DNA damage checkpoint activation impairs chromatin homeostasis and promotes mitotic catastrophe during aging

  2019cites this paper
• Astral microtubule forces alter nuclear organization and inhibit DNA repair in budding yeast

  2019cites this paper
• Help or hindrance: how do microtubule-based forces contribute to genome damage and repair?

  2019cites this paper
• Fanconi Anaemia-Like Mph1 Helicase Backs up Rad54 and Rad5 to Circumvent Replication Stress-Driven Chromosome Bridges

  2018cites this paper
• Functions and regulation of the Polo-like kinase Cdc5 in the absence and presence of DNA damage

  2018cites this paper
• Live cell monitoring of double strand breaks in S. cerevisiae

  2018cites this paper
• Dynamics of age-related catastrophic mitotic failures and recovery in yeast

  2018cites this paper
• Microtubule dynamics drive enhanced chromatin motion and mobilize telomeres in response to DNA damage

  2017cites this paper
• Regulation of Cellular Processes by SUMO: Understudied Topics.

  2017cites this paper
• Assembly of Slx4 Checkpoint Signaling Complexes Behind Stressed DNA Replication Forks

  2016cites this paper
• Three Different Pathways Prevent Chromosome Segregation in the Presence of DNA Damage or Replication Stress in Budding Yeast

  2015cites this paper
• DNA Damage Response Checkpoint Activation Drives KP1019 Dependent Pre-Anaphase Cell Cycle Delay in S. cerevisiae

  2015influential citation
• When genome integrity and cell cycle decisions collide: roles of polo kinases in cellular adaptation to DNA damage

  2014cites this paper
• Stopped in its tracks: Negative regulation of the dynein motor by the yeast protein She1

  2013cites this paper
• Chromatin modifications and chromatin remodeling during DNA repair in budding yeast.

  2013cites this paper
• DNA damage checkpoint triggers autophagy to regulate the initiation of anaphase

  2012cites this paper
• The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Chromatin Remodeler Fun30 Regulates DNA End Resection and Checkpoint Deactivation

  2012cites this paper
• An S/T-Q cluster domain census unveils new putative targets under Tel1/Mec1 control

  2012cites this paper
• Pph3 Dephosphorylation of Rad53 Is Required for Cell Recovery from MMS-Induced DNA Damage in Candida albicans

  2012influential citation
• The role of dynein in yeast nuclear segregation

  2011cites this paper
• Cell Cycle Regulation of DNA Replication in S. cerevisiae

  2011cites this paper
• Sgs1 and Exo1 Redundantly Inhibit Break-Induced Replication and De Novo Telomere Addition at Broken Chromosome Ends

  2010cites this paper
• Fission yeast Rad26ATRIP delays spindle-pole-body separation following interphase microtubule damage

  2010cites this paper
• Mad2 prolongs DNA damage checkpoint arrest caused by a double-strand break via a centromere-dependent mechanism.

  2010cites this paper
• An overview of Cdk1-controlled targets and processes

  2010cites this paper
• Fumarase: A Mitochondrial Metabolic Enzyme and a Cytosolic/Nuclear Component of the DNA Damage Response

  2010cites this paper
• Deregulated Ras signaling compromises DNA damage checkpoint recovery in S. cerevisiae

  2010cites this paper
• Dancing genomes: fungal nuclear positioning

  2009cites this paper
• Chromatin assembly factors Asf1 and CAF-1 have overlapping roles in deactivating the DNA damage checkpoint when DNA repair is complete

  2009influential citation
• Rpb1 Sumoylation in Response to UV Radiation or Transcriptional Impairment in Yeast

  2009cites this paper
• Function of dynein in budding yeast: mitotic spindle positioning in a polarized cell.

  2009cites this paper
• Perspectives on the DNA damage and replication checkpoint responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

  2009cites this paper
• Cdc28/Cdk1 positively and negatively affects genome stability in S. cerevisiae

  2009cites this paper
• Current awareness on yeast

  2008cites this paper