Current directions in behavioral medicine research on genetic testing for disease susceptibility: introduction to the special section

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2015

• Venue

  Journal of behavioral medicine

• Publication date

  2015-09-08

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s10865-015-9674-xPMID 26350552
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Health psychology and translational genomic research: bringing innovation to cancer-related behavioral interventions.

  2015cited by this paper
• Intuition versus cognition: a qualitative exploration of how women understand and manage their increased breast cancer risk

  2015cited by this paper
• Gene-Environment Interactions in Asthma: Genetic and Epigenetic Effects

  2015cited by this paper
• Identification of cancer predisposition variants in apparently healthy individuals using a next-generation sequencing-based family genomics approach

  2015cited by this paper
• Do Health Professionals Need Additional Competencies for Stratified Cancer Prevention Based on Genetic Risk Profiling?

  2015cited by this paper
• Impact of melanoma genetic test reporting on perceived control over melanoma prevention

  2015cited by this paper
• Genetic test reporting enhances understanding of risk information and acceptance of prevention recommendations compared to family history-based counseling alone

  2015cited by this paper
• Genetic counseling content: How does it impact health behavior?

  2015cited by this paper
• Perceived ambiguity as a barrier to intentions to learn genome sequencing results

  2015cited by this paper
• How Well Do Customers of Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing Services Comprehend Genetic Test Results? Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics Study

  2015cited by this paper
• Effects of genetic and environmental risk assessment feedback on colorectal cancer screening adherence

  2015cited by this paper
• The effect of disease risk probability and disease type on interest in clinic-based versus direct-to-consumer genetic testing services

  2015cited by this paper
• Closing the Gap between Knowledge and Clinical Application: Challenges for Genomic Translation

  2015cited by this paper
• Genetics in Degenerative Dementia: Current Status and Applicability

  2014cited by this paper
• DNA Genetic Testing

  2012cited by this paper
• The 'global health' education framework: a conceptual guide for monitoring, evaluation and practice

  2011cited by this paper
• Exploring genomic studies in Africa

  2011cited by this paper
• Efficacy of standardised manual therapy and home exercise programme for chronic rotator cuff disease: randomised placebo controlled trial

  2010cited by this paper
• Utility of genetic and non-genetic risk factors in prediction of type 2 diabetes: Whitehall II prospective cohort study

  2010cited by this paper
• Direct‐to‐consumer genetic testing: good, bad or benign?

  2010cited by this paper
• Genetic screening for low-penetrance variants in protein-coding genes.

  2009cited by this paper
• Community-based participatory research for health : from process to outcomes

  2008cited by this paper
• Colorectal cancer survivors undergoing genetic testing for hereditary non‐polyposis colorectal cancer: motivational factors and psychosocial functioning

  2007cited by this paper
• Genetic Testing for Cancer: Psychological Approaches for Helping Patients and Families

  2004influential reference
• Attitudes and beliefs of an albino population toward sun avoidance: advice and services provided by an outreach albino clinic in Tanzania.

  2002cited by this paper
• A health intervention programme for children with albinism at a special school in South Africa.

  2002cited by this paper
• Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Dovepress the Human Genome Project, and Recent Advances in Personalized Genomics

  year unknowncited by this paper

• Genetic Counseling and Risk Communication

  2021cites this paper