Bagaimana Anak Muda Memahami Kesenjangan Ekonomi?

Victorius Didik Suryo Hartoko,T. D. Hastjarjo,Avin Fadilla Helmi

Published 2019 in Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology (GamaJoP)

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to find out how young adult understand the economic disparity issue and whether ideas related to that problem had authoritarianism and materialism inclinations. The study was done to group of university students age 18 – 30 years old. There were 295 people participating in the study. It utilized survey with open ended questionnaire to figure out participants’ feelings and thoughts toward economic disparity. Subjects also filled out authoritarianism and materialism scales. The result showed that subjects’ responses toward economic disparity could be categorized into three types: 1) critical response (structural), 2) naive individualistic response and 3) fatalistic response. Most subjects provided naive individualistic response. Result of cross tabulation test showed that authorianism had negative correlation with critical response but had positive correlation with naive individualistic response. Materialism had positive correlation with naive individualistic response. Authorianism and materialism were not related to fatalistic response.

PUBLICATION RECORD

  • Publication year

    2019

  • Venue

    Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology (GamaJoP)

  • Publication date

    2019-08-13

  • Fields of study

    Economics, Psychology

  • Identifiers
  • External record

    Open on Semantic Scholar

  • Source metadata

    Semantic Scholar

CITATION MAP

EXTRACTION MAP

CLAIMS

  • No claims are published for this paper.

CONCEPTS

  • No concepts are published for this paper.

REFERENCES

Showing 1-20 of 20 references · Page 1 of 1

CITED BY