SCIENCE@home

Can Pigou at the Polls Stop Us Melting the Poles?

S. Anderson,I. Marinescu,Boris Shor

Published 2019 in Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists

ABSTRACT

Economists recommend Pigouvian taxes as the most efficient way to fight climate change. Yet, carbon taxes are difficult to implement politically. To understand why, we study Washington State’s two failed carbon tax referendums from 2016 and 2018—the first such votes in the United States. We find that average voters’ opposition to the carbon tax can partly be explained by the anticipation of higher energy costs. Meanwhile, ideology—as measured by voting on other initiatives—explains 90% of variation in voting across precincts. These results suggest that ideology plays a crucial role in driving opposition to carbon taxes. We find that revenue recycling interacts with ideology: conservatives preferred the 2016 revenue-neutral policy, while liberals preferred the 2018 green-spending policy. Finally, we forecast that no other state is liberal enough to pass Washington’s policies. Thus, opinion surveys showing majority support for the carbon tax can be misleading.

PUBLICATION RECORD

  • Publication year

    2019

  • Venue

    Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists

  • Publication date

    2019-07-31

  • Fields of study

    Environmental Science, Economics, Political Science

  • Identifiers
    DOI 10.1086/722970
  • External record

    Open on Semantic Scholar

  • Source metadata

    Semantic Scholar

CITATION MAP

EXTRACTION MAP

CLAIMS

  • No claims are published for this paper.

CONCEPTS

  • No concepts are published for this paper.

REFERENCES

Showing 1-52 of 52 references · Page 1 of 1

CITED BY

Showing 1-68 of 68 citing papers · Page 1 of 1