Reasoning about conjunctive probabilistic concepts in childhood.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2005

• Venue

  Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale

• Publication date

  2005-09-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1037/H0087472PMID 16248496
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Frequency illusions and other fallacies

  2003cited by this paper
• Heuristics and Biases: Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate?

  2002cited by this paper
• Judgments under uncertainty: representativeness or potential surprise?

  2002cited by this paper
• The epigenesis of mathematical thinking

  2000cited by this paper
• Data, development, and dual processes in rationality

  2000cited by this paper
• Frequency versus probability formats in statistical word problems.

  2000cited by this paper
• Developmental effects of the content of visually presented baserates

  1998cited by this paper
• The Difficulty of the Linda Conjunction Problem Can Be Attributed to Its Simultaneous Concrete and Unnatural Representation, and Not to Conversational Implicature

  1997cited by this paper
• Rationality and reasoning

  1996cited by this paper
• On Narrow Norms and Vague Heuristics: A Reply to Kahneman and Tversky (1996)

  1996cited by this paper
• Component probabilities and the conjunction fallacy: Resolving signed summation and the low component model in a contingent approach

  1996cited by this paper
• The Representativeness Heuristic and the Conjunction Fallacy Effect in Children's Decision Making.

  1995cited by this paper
• The use of judgment heuristics to make social and object decisions: a developmental perspective

  1991cited by this paper
• Suppressing natural heuristics by formal instruction: The case of the conjunction fallacy

  1989cited by this paper
• The dependence of the conjunction fallacy on subtle linguistic factors

  1988cited by this paper
• Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment

  1983cited by this paper
• Skill and change: variations in estimates of skill with an increasing element of chance.

  1958cited by this paper

• Probability errors in adults' and children's decision-making.

  2025cites this paper
• Experiencing statistical information improves children’s and adults’ inferences

  2022cites this paper
• The illusion of replacement in research into the development of thinking biases: the case of the conjunction fallacy

  2017influential citation
• Towards a pattern-based logic of probability judgements and logical inclusion “fallacies”

  2016cites this paper
• Heuristics and biases

  2015cites this paper
• The Development of Reasoning

  2015cites this paper
• On the conjunction fallacy and the meaning of and, yet again: a reply to Hertwig, Benz, and Krauss (2008).

  2012cites this paper
• Gigerenzer’s ‘external validity argument’ against the heuristics and biases program: an assessment

  2012cites this paper
• Gigerenzer’s ‘external validity argument’ against the heuristics and biases program: an assessment

  2012cites this paper
• The Bayesian logic of frequency-based conjunction fallacies

  2011cites this paper
• Age-trend-related differences in tasks involving conjunctive probabilistic reasoning.

  2008cites this paper
• Reasoning about complex probabilistic concepts in childhood.

  2006cites this paper