The "true" size of fiscal multipliers is widely debated by economists and policy makers as large (small) multipliers provide arguments to expand (cut) public spending. Within a meta-analytical framework, we ask whether the large observed variance in multiplier estimates can be explained by the national imprint and various author incentives. For this purpose, we use data on economists' personal characteristics including results from a selfconducted author survey. Our evidence is consistent with the hypotheses that the national background of researchers and the interests of donors financing the research matter for the degree and direction of multiplier estimates. These potential biases largely disappear for teams of international co-authors.
Biases in fiscal multiplier estimates
Zareh Asatryan,Annika Havlik,F. Heinemann,Justus Nover
Published 2020 in European Journal of Political Economy
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2020
- Venue
European Journal of Political Economy
- Publication date
2020-06-01
- Fields of study
Economics, Political Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-68 of 68 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-14 of 14 citing papers · Page 1 of 1