Abstract Recidivism, or repeated engagement in misconduct despite being sanctioned, among top executives has received limited attention in the literature on organizational misconduct. Based on insights from fairness theory, supplemented by insights from attribution theory, we argue that the likelihood of an executive recidivating is associated with the perceived fairness of the sanctions he/she faces following the initial misconduct. We examine one consequence of a common managerial labor market sanction – lower compensation – on the likelihood of recidivism. Using a sample of Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) who left their positions following financial misconduct at their firms and subsequently migrated to another public firm in the same capacity, we test and find support for our prediction. A number of robustness and endogeneity tests add support to our recidivism model.
Repeated Engagement in Misconduct by Executives Involved with Financial Restatements
P. Khanna,Dina V. Krasikova,Sarfraz Khan,Stewart R. Miller
Published 2019 in Academy of Management Proceedings
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2019
- Venue
Academy of Management Proceedings
- Publication date
2019-08-01
- Fields of study
Business, Psychology
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-92 of 92 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-7 of 7 citing papers · Page 1 of 1