PURPOSE To conduct a national survey to assess practice, knowledge, barriers, and perceptions regarding oxygen saturation (SpO2) target limits among Dutch neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) nurses. DESIGN AND METHODS Cross-sectional, web-based survey among 667 nurses from 9 level 3 Dutch NICUs. Part of the questions were based on a clinical scenario (28-weeks preterm infant, treated with CPAP, FiO2 0.4). RESULTS 328 (53.6%) nurses responded to the survey. Of these, 281 (85.7%) reported to know the local policy of SpO2 target limits, and 261 (79.6%) and 244 (74.4%) rightly identified the lower and upper limit, respectively. Six NICUs recently increased their lower SpO2 limit and for 62.0% of their nurses this led to a significant alarm increase. For the majority of the respondents, the baby from the clinical scenario would spend <10% of the time outside the lower or upper SpO2 limits. Automated oxygen control systems were considered a good idea by 59.2% of the respondents, but 53.9% considered allowing parents to participate in FiO2 titration a bad or very bad idea. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the respondents identified their unit's policy-specified SpO2 target limits and reported that the increase in SpO2 target limits may have led to more alarms. Titration of FiO2 is a part of care that respondents were reluctant to share with parents. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS A potential increase in the number of SpO2 alarms may lead to alarm fatigue. Although family-centered care philosophy is widely accepted across Dutch NICUs, there are still barriers to overcome.
Dutch neonatal intensive care nurses' perceptions of pulse oximeter saturation target limits for preterm infants.
M. J. Huizing,Eduardo Villamor-Martínez,Stefanie Meus,Fred M de Jonge,E. Villamor
Published 2019 in Journal of pediatric nursing
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2019
- Venue
Journal of pediatric nursing
- Publication date
2019-11-01
- Fields of study
Medicine
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-54 of 54 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-4 of 4 citing papers · Page 1 of 1