Uncertainty in WFD assessments for rivers based on macroinvertebrates and RIVPACS Integrated catchment

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2009

• Venue

  Unknown venue

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers

  No identifiers available.

• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Effects of sampling and sub-sampling variation using the STAR-AQEM sampling protocol on the precision of macroinvertebrate metrics

  2006cited by this paper
• Errors and uncertainty in bioassessment methods – major results and conclusions from the STAR project and their application using STARBUGS

  2006cited by this paper
• Estimates and comparisons of the effects of sampling variation using 'national' macroinvertebrate sampling protocols on the precision of metrics used to assess ecological status

  2006cited by this paper
• The development and testing of a macroinvertebrate biotic index for detecting the impact of acidity on streams

  2005cited by this paper
• Effects of sampling error on bioassessments of stream ecosystems: application to RIVPACS-type models

  2004cited by this paper
• Overview and application of the AQEM assessment system

  2004cited by this paper
• RIVPACS models for predicting the expected macroinvertebrate fauna and assessing the ecological quality of rivers

  2003cited by this paper
• Sampling variation in macroinvertebrate data and implications for river quality indices

  2002influential reference
• An introduction to RIVPACS.

  2000cited by this paper
• The potential of RIVPACS for predicting the effects of environmental change.

  2000cited by this paper
• New approaches to river quality classification based upon Artificial Intelligence.

  2000cited by this paper
• Neural network predictors of average score per taxon and number of families at unpolluted river sites in Great Britain

  1998cited by this paper
• Derivation of a biological quality index for river sites: Comparison of the observed with the expected fauna

  1996influential reference
• Biological assessment methods: controlling the quality of biological data. Package 1: The variability of data used for assessing the biological condition of rivers

  1995influential reference
• A preliminary classification of running‐water sites in Great Britain based on macro‐invertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental data

  1984cited by this paper
• The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running-water sites

  1983cited by this paper

• Replicate DNA metabarcoding can discriminate seasonal and spatial abundance shifts in river macroinvertebrate assemblages

  2023cites this paper
• DNA metabarcoding reveals metacommunity dynamics in a threatened boreal wetland wilderness

  2020cites this paper
• Studying Ecosystems With DNA Metabarcoding: Lessons From Biomonitoring of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates

  2019influential citation
• Inter-observer variation in habitat survey data: investigating the consequences for professional practice

  2016influential citation
• Deliverable D 6 . 1-2 : Manuscript reviewing components of uncertainty and their assessment , including guidelines for estimation and quality assurance

  2011cites this paper