Response to Letter Regarding Article, "Poorly Cited Articles in Peer-Reviewed Cardiovascular Journals from 1997 to 2007: Analysis of 5-Year Citation Rates".

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2016

• Venue

  Circulation

• Publication date

  2016-01-12

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018777PMID 27028443
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Articles in Peer-Reviewed Cardiovascular Journals from 1997-2007 : Analysis of 5-Year Citation Rates

  2015cited by this paper
• Global Cardiovascular Research Output, Citations, and Collaborations: A Time-Trend, Bibliometric Analysis (1999–2008)

  2013cited by this paper
• Differences in citation frequency of clinical and basic science papers in cardiovascular research

  2011cited by this paper
• Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence

  2009cited by this paper
• Science, citation, and funding.

  1991cited by this paper
• Science, citation, and funding.

  1991cited by this paper
• Publishing by--and for?--the numbers.

  1990cited by this paper

• Estudo transversal das citações do Jornal Vascular Brasileiro e de autores brasileiros entre os anos de 2016-2024

  2025cites this paper
• Cross-sectional study of citations from Brazilian Vascular Journal and Brazilian authors between the years 2016-2024

  2025cites this paper
• Worldwide research landscape of artificial intelligence in lung disease: A scientometric study

  2024cites this paper
• The top 100 cited articles in menstrual health among adolescent girls: a citation analysis

  2023cites this paper
• Evaluation of articles in metabolism research on the basis of their citations

  2020influential citation
• Methodological Rigor in Preclinical Cardiovascular Studies: Targets to Enhance Reproducibility and Promote Research Translation

  2017cites this paper
• Citation behavior: A large‐scale test of the persuasion by name‐dropping hypothesis

  2017cites this paper
• Statistical analyses of digital collections: using a large corpus of systematic reviews to study non-citations

  2017cites this paper
• Methodological Rigor in Preclinical Cardiovascular Studies

  2017cites this paper
• Is anybody listening?

  2015cites this paper