The FAIR principles were received with broad acceptance in several scientific communities. However, there is still some degree of uncertainty on how they should be implemented. Several self-report questionnaires have been proposed to assess the implementation of the FAIR principles. Moreover, the FAIRmetrics group released 14, general-purpose maturity for representing FAIRness. Initially, these metrics were conducted as open-answer questionnaires. Recently, these metrics have been implemented into a software that can automatically harvest metadata from metadata providers and generate a principle-specific FAIRness evaluation. With so many different approaches for FAIRness evaluations, we believe that further clarification on their limitations and advantages, as well as on their interpretation and interplay should be considered.
Considerations for the Conduction and Interpretation of FAIRness Evaluations
Published 2020 in Data Intelligence
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2020
- Venue
Data Intelligence
- Publication date
2020-01-01
- Fields of study
Computer Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-12 of 12 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-22 of 22 citing papers · Page 1 of 1