Dual-task performance with ideomotor-compatible tasks: is the central processing bottleneck intact, bypassed, or shifted in locus?

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2005

• Venue

  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

• Publication date

  2005-02-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.122PMID 15709868
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Is the psychological refractory period effect for ideomotor compatible tasks eliminated by speed-stress instructions?

  2007cited by this paper
• How does practice reduce dual-task interference: Integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening?

  2006cited by this paper
• On doing two things at once: IV. Necessary and sufficient conditions: Rejoinder to Lien, Proctor, and Ruthruff (2003).

  2004cited by this paper
• Still no evidence for perfect timesharing with two ideomotor-compatible tasks: a reply to Greenwald (2003).

  2003cited by this paper
• Task switching and response correspondence in the psychological refractory period paradigm.

  2003cited by this paper
• Dual-task interference with equal task emphasis: Graded capacity sharing or central postponement?

  2003cited by this paper
• Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent?

  2003cited by this paper
• On doing two things at once: III. Confirmation of perfect timesharing when simultaneous tasks are ideomotor compatible.

  2003influential reference
• Ideomotor compatibility in the psychological refractory period effect: 29 years of oversimplification.

  2002cited by this paper
• Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection

  2002cited by this paper
• Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice.

  2002cited by this paper
• Serial modules in parallel: the psychological refractory period and perfect time-sharing.

  2001cited by this paper
• Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations.

  2001cited by this paper
• Why practice reduces dual-task interference.

  2001cited by this paper
• Is dual-task slowing instruction dependent?

  2001cited by this paper
• Virtually Perfect Time Sharing in Dual-Task Performance: Uncorking the Central Cognitive Bottleneck

  2001influential reference
• Processing bottlenecks in dual-task performance: Structural limitation or strategic postponement?

  2001cited by this paper
• The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning.

  2001cited by this paper
• Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory.

  2000influential reference
• Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance.

  2000cited by this paper
• Concurrent response-selection processes in dual-task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling.

  1999cited by this paper
• Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect?

  1999influential reference
• Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance.

  1998influential reference
• Attentional limitations in dual-task performance.

  1998cited by this paper
• Decision and Response in Dual-Task Interference

  1997influential reference
• A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms.

  1997cited by this paper
• A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena.

  1997cited by this paper
• The Role of Preparation in Overlapping-task Performance

  1995influential reference
• Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory.

  1994cited by this paper
• Saccadic Eye Movements and Dual-Task Interference

  1993influential reference
• Dual-Task Interference and Elementary Mental Mechanisms

  1993cited by this paper
• Dual-task interference and the cerebral hemispheres.

  1993cited by this paper
• Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference

  1992cited by this paper
• Procedural learning: II. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks.

  1991cited by this paper
• Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks

  1989cited by this paper
• Tutorials in Motor Behavior

  1980cited by this paper
• 21 The Ubiquitous Role of Preparation

  1980cited by this paper
• Attention and Performance VI

  1978cited by this paper
• Response Selection Errors in Spatial Choice Reaction Tasks

  1977cited by this paper
• On doing two things at once. II. Elimination of the psychological refractory period effect.

  1973influential reference
• On doing two things at once: time sharing as a function of ideomotor compatibility.

  1972influential reference
• The persistence of psychological refractoriness.

  1971influential reference
• Psychological refractoriness with varying differences between tasks.

  1968cited by this paper
• Stimulus-response compatibility and parallel response selection.

  1967cited by this paper
• The refractory period of choice reactions with regular and irregular interstimuli intervals.

  1967cited by this paper
• THE ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD’ AND THE TIMING OF HIGH‐SPEED PERFORMANCE—A REVIEW AND A THEORY

  1952cited by this paper
• The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses

  1931cited by this paper
• The Psychology of Attention

  year unknowncited by this paper
• American Psychological Association, Inc. Processing Stages in Overlapping Tasks: Evidence for a Central Bottleneck

  year unknowncited by this paper

• When boosting preparation sets older adults free from central bottlenecking: Evidence for dual-task automaticity

  2025cites this paper
• The neural basis of cognitive processing: A review and a speculative architecture.

  2025cites this paper
• Prospective reward in dual task induces a bias towards action at the cost of less accurate Task 2 performance

  2025cites this paper
• EXPRESS: Evidence for a latent bottleneck after extensive dual-task practice of a visual-manual and an auditory-verbal task.

  2025cites this paper
• Task-order control in dual-tasks: Only marginal interactions between conflict at lower levels and higher processes of task organization

  2024cites this paper
• Between- and within-subject covariance perspectives matter for investigations into the relationship between single- and dual-tasking performance

  2023cites this paper
• Evidence of resource sharing in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm.

  2022cites this paper
• Bypassing the central bottleneck with easy tasks: Beyond ideomotor compatibility

  2021cites this paper
• The role of attentional slippage in Stroop dilution.

  2020cites this paper
• Cross-modal psychological refractory period in vision, audition, and haptics

  2020cites this paper
• Factors Influencing Speed of Cancer Diagnosis in Rural WA

  2020cites this paper
• Ideomotor compatibility enables automatic response selection

  2020cites this paper
• Haptic and Auditory-Haptic Attentional Blink in Spatial and Object-Based Tasks.

  2019cites this paper
• Habit as a moderator of the association of utilitarian motivation and hedonic motivation with purchase intention: Implications for social networking websites

  2019cites this paper
• A psychological model of human-computer cooperation for the era of artificial intelligence

  2018cites this paper
• Refractory Period ( PRP ) and Emotions : Final dissertation

  2017cites this paper
• Higher-Order Cognitive Control in Dual Tasks: Evidence From Task-Pair Switching

  2017cites this paper
• Backward compatibility effects in younger and older adults

  2016cites this paper
• A cognitive framework for explaining serial processing and sequence execution strategies

  2015cites this paper
• Ideomotor-compatible tasks partially escape dual-task interference in both young and elderly adults.

  2015cites this paper
• On the importance of Task 1 and error performance measures in PRP dual-task studies

  2015cites this paper
• A cognitive framework for explaining serial processing and sequence execution strategies

  2014cites this paper
• What causes dual-task costs?

  2013cites this paper
• Freedom and rules in human sequential performance: a refractory period in eye-hand coordination.

  2013cites this paper
• Investigating perfect timesharing: the relationship between IM-compatible tasks and dual-task performance.

  2013cites this paper
• Evidence for graded central processing resources in a sequential movement task

  2013cites this paper
• From a single decision to a multi-step algorithm.

  2012cites this paper
• Effects of practice on task architecture: combined evidence from interference experiments and random-walk models of decision making.

  2011cites this paper
• Modulating the interference effect in timing with varying stimulus onset asynchrony.

  2011cites this paper
• Integración de información en tareas secuenciales

  2011cites this paper
• Grasping for parsimony: do some motor actions escape dorsal processing?

  2010cites this paper
• A review of contemporary ideomotor theory.

  2010cites this paper
• Response selection in dual task paradigms: observations from random generation tasks

  2010influential citation
• Interference in skilled and unskilled grasping

  2010cites this paper
• How strategic is the central bottleneck: can it be overcome by trying harder?

  2009cites this paper
• Brain Mechanisms of Serial and Parallel Processing during Dual-Task Performance

  2008cites this paper
• Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment

  2008cites this paper
• Are spatial responses to visuospatial stimuli and spoken responses to auditory letters ideomotor-compatible tasks? Examination of set-size effects on dual-task interference.

  2008cites this paper
• On the nonautomaticity of visual word processing: electrophysiological evidence that word processing requires central attention.

  2008cites this paper
• Response activation in overlapping tasks and the response-selection bottleneck.

  2008cites this paper
• Simultaneous Media Usage: Effects on Attention

  2008cites this paper
• Specific interference effects between temporally overlapping action and perception

  2007cites this paper
• Factors influencing the speed of cancer diagnosis in rural Western Australia: a General Practice perspective

  2007cites this paper
• Is the psychological refractory period effect for ideomotor compatible tasks eliminated by speed-stress instructions?

  2007cites this paper
• Action-effect codes in and before the central bottleneck: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.

  2007cites this paper
• Brain activity associated with dual-task management differs depending on the combinations of response modalities.

  2007cites this paper
• Success and failure at dual-task coordination by younger and older adults.

  2007cites this paper
• Localizing practice effects in dual-task performance

  2007cites this paper
• SELECTION AND CONTROL OF ACTION

  2006cites this paper
• Multimedia Impact on Human Cognition

  2006cites this paper
• Dynamics of the Central Bottleneck: Dual-Task and Task Uncertainty

  2006cites this paper
• Attentional Limitations in Doing Two Tasks at Once

  2006cites this paper
• How does practice reduce dual-task interference: Integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening?

  2006cites this paper
• What causes residual dual-task interference after practice?

  2006cites this paper
• Visual word recognition without central attention: evidence for greater automaticity with advancing age.

  2006cites this paper
• A reminder about procedures needed to reliably produce perfect timesharing: comment on Lien, McCann, Ruthruff, and Proctor (2005).

  2005cites this paper
• Automating Vehicle Operations in Next -Generation Spacecraft: Human Factors Issues

  2005cites this paper
• Confirming and disconfirming theories about ideomotor compatibility in dual-task performance: a reply to Greenwald (2005).

  2005cites this paper
• Learning to achieve perfect timesharing: architectural implications of Hazeltine, Teague, and Ivry (2002).

  2005influential citation
• Investigating Perfect Timesharing: the Relationship between Im-compatible Tasks and Dual-task Performance Ideomotor Compatibility and Dual-task Costs

  year unknowncites this paper