This paper investigates how social enterprises construct accounts to gain legitimacy from the social impact generated by their products and operations. The paper finds that social impact accounts are framed to appeal to two distinct forms of judgment about legitimacy: cognitive and evaluative. Cognitive forms of judgment qualify how well an enterprise shares attributes with an individual’s schemas of established actors or roles in society. Evaluative forms of judgment tend to operate more analytically to make comparisons of the relative appropriateness and desirability of multiple enterprises to achieve an audience’s goals. The findings show that although legitimizing the social aspects of an enterprise involved justifications aimed at both forms of judgment, legitimizing an enterprise’s professionalism relied almost exclusively on evaluative judgments. Moreover, the justifications created to appeal to evaluative judgments relied almost exclusively on financial and operational data, using operational scale as a proxy.
Justifying Social Impact as a Form of Impression Management: Legitimacy Judgements of Social Enterprises’ Impact Accounts
Published 2020 in British Journal of Management
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2020
- Venue
British Journal of Management
- Publication date
2020-03-02
- Fields of study
Sociology, Business
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-61 of 61 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-34 of 34 citing papers · Page 1 of 1