Historical Case Studies: The “Model Organisms” of Philosophy of Science

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2020

• Venue

  Erkenntnis: An International Journal of Scientific Philosophy

• Publication date

  2020-02-14

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s10670-020-00224-5
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Theoretical Virtues in Science

  2018cited by this paper
• Scenes from a Marriage: On the Confrontation Model of History and Philosophy of Science

  2018cited by this paper
• Animal Models in Translational Research: Rosetta Stone or Stumbling Block?

  2017cited by this paper
• Non-model model organisms

  2017cited by this paper
• Towards a Methodology for Integrated History and Philosophy of Science

  2016cited by this paper
• The re-emergence of hyphenated history-and-philosophy-of-science and the testing of theories of scientific change.

  2016cited by this paper
• Inference to the best explanation in the catch-22: how much autonomy for Mill’s method of difference?

  2015cited by this paper
• Narrative and evidence. How can case studies from the history of science support claims in the philosophy of science?

  2015cited by this paper
• Philosophy of Science and the Curse of the Case Study

  2015cited by this paper
• Cultural Evolution: Conceptual Challenges

  2015cited by this paper
• Model Organisms are Not (Theoretical) Models

  2015cited by this paper
• Model species in evo‐devo: a philosophical perspective

  2014cited by this paper
• What was Hodgkin and Huxley’s Achievement?

  2014cited by this paper
• Philosophy of Microbiology

  2014cited by this paper
• Causal inference, mechanisms, and the Semmelweis case

  2013cited by this paper
• The Kuhnian mode of HPS

  2013cited by this paper
• A Confrontation of Convergent Realism

  2013cited by this paper
• Shattering the Myth of Semmelweis

  2013cited by this paper
• Darwinism and cultural change

  2012cited by this paper
• Beyond Case-Studies: History as Philosophy

  2011cited by this paper
• What’s so special about model organisms?

  2011cited by this paper
• More Thoughts on HPS: Another 20 Years Later

  2011cited by this paper
• Eliminative Abduction—Examples from Medicine

  2010cited by this paper
• Generalization and Discovery by Assuming Conserved Mechanisms: Cross‐Species Research on Circadian Oscillators

  2009cited by this paper
• Causes without Mechanisms: Experimental Regularities, Physical Laws, and Neuroscientific Explanation

  2008cited by this paper
• Physical Law and Mechanistic Explanation in the Hodgkin and Huxley Model of the Action Potential

  2008cited by this paper
• The Pleasures and Perils of Darwinizing Culture (with Phylogenies)

  2007cited by this paper
• Hempelian and Kuhnian approaches in the philosophy of medicine: the Semmelweis case.

  2005cited by this paper
• Philosophy of Experimental Biology: Developmental Biology and the Genetic Program: Explaining Ontogeny

  2004cited by this paper
• PERSPECTIVE: IS HUMAN CULTURAL EVOLUTION DARWINIAN? EVIDENCE REVIEWED FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES

  2004cited by this paper
• Inference to the Best Explanation, 2nd edition

  2004cited by this paper
• The Dilemma of Case Studies: Toward a Heraclitian Philosophy of Science

  2001cited by this paper
• Book Review: To Improve the Evidence of Medicine: The 18th Century British Origins of a Critical Approach

  2001cited by this paper
• History and Philosophy of Science: a Phylogenetic approach

  2001cited by this paper
• Does Culture Evolve

  1999cited by this paper
• Philosophy of Science and History of Science

  1995cited by this paper
• Quantification and the Quest for Medical Certainty

  1995cited by this paper
• Inference to the best explanation

  1993cited by this paper
• Testing Philosophical Claims about Science

  1992cited by this paper
• Scrutinizing Science: Empirical Studies of Scientific Change

  1992cited by this paper
• ‘Style’ for historians and philosophers☆

  1992cited by this paper
• Normative Naturalism

  1990cited by this paper
• Scientific rationality as instrumental rationality

  1989cited by this paper
• Fix it and be Damned: A Reply to Laudan

  1989cited by this paper
• If It Ain't Broke, Don't Fix It

  1989cited by this paper
• A mechanism and its metaphysics: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science

  1988cited by this paper
• The Value of a Fixed Methodology*

  1988cited by this paper
• Methodology's Prospects

  1986cited by this paper
• Scientific change: Philosophical models and historical research

  1986cited by this paper
• Philosophy of Science Naturalized

  1985cited by this paper
• A Confutation of Convergent Realism

  1981cited by this paper
• The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Volume 1: Philosophical Papers

  1980cited by this paper
• The methodology of scientific research programmes: Contents

  1978cited by this paper
• HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE: INTIMATE RELATIONSHIP OR MARRIAGE OF CONVENIENCE?

  1973cited by this paper
• Philosophy of Natural Science

  1966cited by this paper
• The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

  1963cited by this paper

• Enhancing the function of case studies: the value of network analysis in integrated history and philosophy of science

  2025cites this paper
• Marine constraints as philosophical opportunities: the Krogh principle and the benefits of philosophical engagement with the sea

  2025cites this paper
• Bringing thought experiments back into the philosophy of science.

  2024cites this paper
• The tragedy of the canon; or, path dependence in the history and philosophy of science.

  2021influential citation
• Beyond footnotes: Lakatos’s meta-philosophy and the history of science

  year unknowncites this paper