Assessing evidence and testing appropriate hypotheses.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2014

• Venue

  Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society

• Publication date

  2014-12-01

• Fields of study

  Law, Medicine, Engineering

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.scijus.2014.10.007PMID 25498940PMCID PMC4306208
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• When 'neutral' evidence still has probative value (with implications from the Barry George Case).

  2014cited by this paper
• How clear is transparent? Reporting expert reasoning in legal cases

  2012cited by this paper
• Science and law: Improve statistics in court

  2011cited by this paper
• On the (ab)use of statistics in the legal case against the nurse Lucia de B

  2006cited by this paper
• Reflections on the cot death cases

  2005cited by this paper
• Misleading statistics within criminal trials

  2005cited by this paper
• Probability and Proof. On-line Appendix to Analysis of Evidence (second Edition), by T.J. Anderson, D.A. Shum and W.L. Twining.

  2005cited by this paper
• Sally Clark--a lesson for us all.

  2003cited by this paper
• Analysis of Evidence

  1991cited by this paper

• The Relationship between Research and Casework in Forensic Entomology

  2021cites this paper
• Making Forensic Evaluations: Forensic Objectivity in the Swedish Criminal Justice System

  2019cites this paper
• Bayes and the Law : Supplementary Material

  2016cites this paper
• Bayes and the Law.

  2016cites this paper
• 1 Bayes and the Law

  2015cites this paper
• Improving legal reasoning using Bayesian probability methods

  2015influential citation