Developing Registries and Effective Care Models for the Management of Hip Fractures: Aligning Political, Organizational Drivers with Clinical Outcomes

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2020

• Venue

  Current Osteoporosis Reports

• Publication date

  2020-04-02

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Business

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s11914-020-00582-7PMID 32242305
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Letter to the Editor on "Mortality and Implant Survival With Simultaneous and Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Experience From the Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry".

  2019cited by this paper
• Economic impact and cost-effectiveness of fracture liaison services: a systematic review of the literature

  2018cited by this paper
• Cost‐Effectiveness of Orthogeriatric and Fracture Liaison Service Models of Care for Hip Fracture Patients: A Population‐Based Study

  2017cited by this paper
• Fracture liaison services: improving outcomes for patients with osteoporosis

  2017cited by this paper
• Economic evaluation of a population-based osteoporosis intervention for outpatients with non-traumatic non-hip fractures: the “Catch a Break” 1i [type C] FLS

  2017cited by this paper
• A critical review of the long-term disability outcomes following hip fracture

  2016cited by this paper
• A Community-Based Hip Fracture Registry: Population, Methods, and Outcomes.

  2015cited by this paper
• Cost-effectiveness of a fracture liaison service—a real-world evaluation after 6 years of service provision

  2015cited by this paper
• Toward a Generalized Framework of Core Measurement Areas in Clinical Trials: A Position Paper for OMERACT 11

  2014cited by this paper
• Hip fracture: the case for a funded national registry

  2014cited by this paper
• Cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis interventions for 'incidental' vertebral fractures.

  2013cited by this paper
• Models of care for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  2013cited by this paper
• Identifying a standard set of outcome parameters for the evaluation of orthogeriatric co-management for hip fractures.

  2013cited by this paper
• Hip arthroplasty.

  2012cited by this paper
• Cost savings of using a cemented total hip replacement: an analysis of the National Joint Registry data.

  2012cited by this paper
• Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.

  2012cited by this paper
• A survey of Australian clinical registries: can quality of care be measured?

  2011cited by this paper
• Fracture liaison services for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture: a cost-effectiveness evaluation based on data collected over 8 years of service provision

  2011cited by this paper
• Cost-effectiveness of the Concord Minimal Trauma Fracture Liaison service, a prospective, controlled fracture prevention study

  2011cited by this paper
• Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide

  2010cited by this paper
• Clinical‐quality registries: their role in quality improvement

  2010cited by this paper
• First hip arthroplasty register in Italy: 55,000 cases and 7 year follow-up

  2009cited by this paper
• National Registration of Hip Fractures in Sweden

  2009cited by this paper
• Facilitated bone mineral density testing versus hospital-based case management to improve osteoporosis treatment for hip fracture patients: additional results from a randomized trial.

  2009cited by this paper
• Osteoporosis case manager for patients with hip fractures: results of a cost-effectiveness analysis conducted alongside a randomized trial.

  2009cited by this paper
• The Kaiser Permanente implant registries: effect on patient safety, quality improvement, cost effectiveness, and research opportunities.

  2008cited by this paper
• The value of trauma registries.

  2008cited by this paper
• National registration of hip fractures

  2008cited by this paper
• A coordinator program in post-fracture osteoporosis management improves outcomes and saves costs.

  2008cited by this paper
• A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality.

  2006cited by this paper
• A National Evaluation of the Effect of Trauma-center Care on Mortality

  2006influential reference
• Osteoporosis disease management in a rural health care population: hip fracture reduction and reduced costs in postmenopausal women after 5 years

  2003influential reference
• Directory of clinical databases: improving and promoting their use

  2003cited by this paper
• The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register

  2000cited by this paper

• Developing fracture liaison service framework based on comparative analysis and scoping review

  2024cites this paper
• Post-fracture care programs for prevention of subsequent fragility fractures: a literature assessment of current trends

  2022cites this paper
• The economic burden of osteoporosis in Iran in 2020

  2022cites this paper