Does breast cancer screening level health inequalities out? A population-based study in an Italian region.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2014

• Venue

  European Journal of Public Health

• Publication date

  2014-04-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Sociology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1093/eurpub/ckt119PMID 24008553
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review

  2013cited by this paper
• Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

  2013cited by this paper
• Summary of the Evidence of Breast Cancer Service Screening Outcomes in Europe and First Estimate of the Benefit and Harm Balance Sheet

  2012cited by this paper
• Socioeconomic disparities in the uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening in Italy: a cross sectional study

  2012cited by this paper
• Does an organised screening programme reduce the inequalities in breast cancer survival?

  2012cited by this paper
• The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

  2012cited by this paper
• Is mammographic screening justifiable considering its substantial overdiagnosis rate and minor effect on mortality?

  2011cited by this paper
• Socioeconomic inequalities in attending the mass screening for breast cancer in the south of the Netherlands—associations with stage at diagnosis and survival

  2011cited by this paper
• Socioeconomic status and survival after an invasive breast cancer diagnosis

  2011cited by this paper
• The socioeconomic determinants of cancer

  2011cited by this paper
• Global cancer statistics

  2011cited by this paper
• Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008

  2010cited by this paper
• Screening for breast cancer—balancing the debate

  2010cited by this paper
• Socio-economic inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening practices in Europe: influence of the type of screening program.

  2010cited by this paper
• Cancer risk in relationship to different indicators of adult socioeconomic position in Turin, Italy

  2010cited by this paper
• The Influence of Socioeconomic Disparities on Breast Cancer Tumor Biology and Prognosis: A Review

  2009cited by this paper
• Trends in Area-Socioeconomic and Race-Ethnic Disparities in Breast Cancer Incidence, Stage at Diagnosis, Screening, Mortality, and Survival among Women Ages 50 Years and Over (1987-2005)

  2009cited by this paper
• Does a national screening programme reduce socioeconomic inequalities in mammography use?

  2009cited by this paper
• Social differences in breast cancer survival in relation to patient management within a National Health Care System (Sweden)

  2009cited by this paper
• The influence of socio-economic and surveillance characteristics on breast cancer survival: a French population-based study

  2008cited by this paper
• Long-term inequalities in breast cancer survival – a ten year follow-up study of patients managed within a National Health Care System (Sweden)

  2008cited by this paper
• Breast cancer (non-metastatic).

  2007cited by this paper
• Impact of a programme of mass mammography screening for breast cancer on socio-economic variation in survival: a population-based study

  2007cited by this paper
• An overview of prognostic factors for long-term survivors of breast cancer

  2007cited by this paper
• Pathways of disadvantage and smoking careers: evidence and policy implications

  2006cited by this paper
• Social class is an important and independent prognostic factor of breast cancer mortality

  2006cited by this paper
• Early diagnosis, not differential treatment, explains better survival in service screening.

  2005cited by this paper
• Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1)

  2005cited by this paper
• Socio-economic factors and breast cancer survival – a population-based cohort study (Sweden)

  2005cited by this paper
• Global Cancer Statistics, 2002

  2005cited by this paper
• A cancer survival model that takes sociodemographic variations in “normal” mortality into account: comparison with other models

  2002cited by this paper
• Sociodemographic variations in breast cancer screening behavior among Australian women: results from the 1995 National Health Survey.

  2002cited by this paper
• Cribbage

  2001cited by this paper
• Sifting the evidence-what's wrong with significance tests?

  2001cited by this paper
• Probability and Random Variables

  1999cited by this paper
• Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

  1998cited by this paper
• Measuring social class differences in cancer patient survival: is it necessary to control for social class differences in general population mortality? A Finnish population-based study.

  1998cited by this paper
• Social class and cancer survival in Turin, Italy.

  1997cited by this paper
• Possible explanations for social class differences in cancer patient survival.

  1997cited by this paper
• Socioeconomic differences in cancer survival: a review of the evidence.

  1997cited by this paper
• Survival Analysis: A Self-Learning Text

  1997cited by this paper
• Attributable risks for breast cancer in Italy: Education, family history and reproductive and hormonal factors

  1997cited by this paper
• Cancer patient survival by socioeconomic status in seven countries: a review for six common cancer sites [corrected]

  1994cited by this paper
• Screening in Chronic Disease

  1985cited by this paper

• Multi-dimensional scaling of healthcare system profiles and pandemic outcomes in Cuba, Spain, Italy, and Germany

  2025cites this paper
• Impact of PRECEDE–PROCEED Model Audits in Cancer Screening Programs in Lombardy Region: Supporting Equity and Quality Improvement

  2024cites this paper
• The epidemiology of the most frequent cancers in Poland in 2015–2021 and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer incidence

  2024cites this paper
• Relationship between Health Inequalities and Breast Cancer Survival in Mexican Women

  2023cites this paper
• During a storm – the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the epidemiology of the most frequent cancers in Poland

  2023cites this paper
• Impact of health disparities on national breast cancer screening participation rates in South Korea

  2023cites this paper
• Socio-economic inequality of utilization of cancer testing in Europe: A cross-sectional study

  2022cites this paper
• Mortality from cancer in people with severe mental disorders in Emilia Romagna Region, Italy

  2021cites this paper
• Social Disparities in Survival from Breast Cancer in Europe

  2021cites this paper
• Influence of adherence with guideline-driven recommendations on survival in women operated for breast cancer: Real-life evidence from Italy

  2020cites this paper
• Geographic Inequalities in Breast Cancer in Italy: Trend Analysis of Mortality and Risk Factors

  2020cites this paper
• Early detection of breast cancer rectifies inequality of breast cancer outcomes

  2020cites this paper
• An ecological study on health inequalities in the city of Bologna (Emilia-Romagna Region, Northern Italy): bridging knowledge and action.

  2020cites this paper
• Opportunistic screening for type 2 diabetes in community pharmacies. Results from a region-wide experience in Italy

  2020cites this paper
• LSHTM Research Online

  2019cites this paper
• Assessing the impact of a public health intervention to reduce social inequalities in cancer

  2019cites this paper
• Efficience de programmes de santé publique visant à réduire les inégalités de participation au dépistage organisé des cancers

  2019cites this paper
• Geographical and socioeconomic differences in uptake of Pap test and mammography in Italy: results from the National Health Interview Survey

  2018cites this paper
• Impact of breast cancer screening in a population with high spontaneous coverage with mammography

  2018cites this paper
• Radiological Screening of Breast Cancer: Evolution

  2017cites this paper
• Socioeconomic deprivation worsens the outcomes of Italian women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and decreases the possibility of receiving standard care

  2017cites this paper
• Absence of socioeconomic inequalities in access to good-quality breast cancer treatment within a population-wide screening programme in Turin (Italy)

  2016influential citation
• Impacto epidemiológico y económico del programa de detección precoz del cáncer de mama en el País Vasco: Desarrollo de un modelo de Simulación

  2016cites this paper
• Quasi-Experimental Evidence on the Effects of Health Information on Preventive Behaviour in Europe†

  2016cites this paper
• Differences in mortality among women with breast cancer by income – a register-based study in Finland

  2016cites this paper
• Impact of deprivation on breast cancer survival among women eligible for mammographic screening in the West Midlands (UK) and New South Wales (Australia): Women diagnosed 1997–2006

  2016cites this paper
• Economic evaluation of the breast cancer screening programme in the Basque Country: retrospective cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis

  2016cites this paper
• Optimising colorectal cancer screening acceptance: a review

  2015cites this paper
• Does the letter matter (and for everyone)? Quasi-experimental evidence on the effects of home invitation on mammography uptake

  2014cites this paper
• Evaluation of breast cancer screening in the north of Portugal

  2014cites this paper
• An economic examination of cancer screening

  2014cites this paper
• Does the Letter Matter ( and for Everyone ) ? Quasi-experimental Evidence on the Eff ects of Home Invitation on Mammography Uptake # 491

  2014cites this paper