One‐stage individual participant data meta‐analysis models for continuous and binary outcomes: Comparison of treatment coding options and estimation methods

A one‐stage individual participant data (IPD) meta‐analysis synthesizes IPD from multiple studies using a general or generalized linear mixed model. This produces summary results (eg, about treatment effect) in a single step, whilst accounting for clustering of participants within studies (via a stratified study intercept, or random study intercepts) and between‐study heterogeneity (via random treatment effects). We use simulation to evaluate the performance of restricted maximum likelihood (REML) and maximum likelihood (ML) estimation of one‐stage IPD meta‐analysis models for synthesizing randomized trials with continuous or binary outcomes. Three key findings are identified. First, for ML or REML estimation of stratified intercept or random intercepts models, a t‐distribution based approach generally improves coverage of confidence intervals for the summary treatment effect, compared with a z‐based approach. Second, when using ML estimation of a one‐stage model with a stratified intercept, the treatment variable should be coded using “study‐specific centering” (ie, 1/0 minus the study‐specific proportion of participants in the treatment group), as this reduces the bias in the between‐study variance estimate (compared with 1/0 and other coding options). Third, REML estimation reduces downward bias in between‐study variance estimates compared with ML estimation, and does not depend on the treatment variable coding; for binary outcomes, this requires REML estimation of the pseudo‐likelihood, although this may not be stable in some situations (eg, when data are sparse). Two applied examples are used to illustrate the findings.

• Publication year

  2020

• Venue

  Statistics in Medicine

• Publication date

  2020-05-11

• Fields of study

  Mathematics, Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1002/sim.8555PMID 32394498
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• A comparison of arm‐based and contrast‐based models for network meta‐analysis

  2019cited by this paper
• A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random‐effects meta‐analyses

  2018cited by this paper
• A comparison of seven random‐effects models for meta‐analyses that estimate the summary odds ratio

  2018cited by this paper
• Meta‐analysis of Gaussian individual patient data: Two‐stage or not two‐stage?

  2018cited by this paper
• Estimating the variance for heterogeneity in arm‐based network meta‐analysis

  2018cited by this paper
• Individual participant data meta‐analysis of continuous outcomes: A comparison of approaches for specifying and estimating one‐stage models

  2018influential reference
• Effects of antenatal diet and physical activity on maternal and fetal outcomes: individual patient data meta-analysis and health economic evaluation.

  2017cited by this paper
• A comparison of analytic approaches for individual patient data meta-analyses with binary outcomes

  2017influential reference
• A general framework for the use of logistic regression models in meta-analysis

  2016cited by this paper
• Meta‐analysis using individual participant data: one‐stage and two‐stage approaches, and why they may differ

  2016cited by this paper
• A decade of individual participant data meta-analyses: A review of current practice.

  2015influential reference
• Predictive distributions were developed for the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analyses of continuous outcome data

  2015cited by this paper
• Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

  2014cited by this paper
• Meta‐analysis of randomised trials with a continuous outcome according to baseline imbalance and availability of individual participant data

  2013cited by this paper
• Individual participant data meta-analyses should not ignore clustering

  2013influential reference
• runmlwin : A Program to Run the MLwiN Multilevel Modeling Software from within Stata

  2013cited by this paper
• Individual participant data meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies: state of the art?

  2012cited by this paper
• Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

  2012cited by this paper
• Performance of statistical methods for meta-analysis when true study effects are non-normally distributed: A comparison between DerSimonian–Laird and restricted maximum likelihood

  2012cited by this paper
• Generalized Linear Mixed Models: Modern Concepts, Methods and Applications

  2012cited by this paper
• Random effects meta‐analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data

  2010cited by this paper
• Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting

  2010influential reference
• Hans van Houwelingen and the Art of Summing up

  2010cited by this paper
• A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis

  2009cited by this paper
• Bmc Medical Research Methodology Open Access Bivariate Random-effects Meta-analysis and the Estimation of Between-study Correlation

  2007cited by this paper
• Investigating heterogeneity in an individual patient data meta‐analysis of time to event outcomes

  2005cited by this paper
• Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements

  2001cited by this paper
• A multilevel model framework for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes.

  2000cited by this paper
• Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood.

  1997cited by this paper
• The application of REML in clinical trials.

  1994cited by this paper
• A bivariate approach to meta-analysis.

  1993cited by this paper
• Generalized linear mixed models a pseudo-likelihood approach

  1993cited by this paper
• Maximum Likelihood Approaches to Variance Component Estimation and to Related Problems

  1977cited by this paper
• CONSISTENCY OF THE MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATOR IN THE PRESENCE OF INFINITELY MANY INCIDENTAL PARAMETERS

  1956cited by this paper
• An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components.

  1946cited by this paper
• An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components.

  1946cited by this paper

• Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in Stroke and the PASCAL Classification System.

  2026cites this paper
• Methodological Guidance for Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses: A Systematic Review.

  2025cites this paper
• The clinical efficacy of psychological interventions for bipolar depression: a systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis

  2025cites this paper
• Impact of hippocampectomy on seizure freedom in temporal encephaloceles: A systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis

  2025cites this paper
• Titanium-nitride-oxide-coated vs. drug-eluting stents in acute coronary syndromes: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

  2025cites this paper
• Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in Older Patients With Stroke

  2024cites this paper
• An Introduction to Meta-Analysis.

  2023cites this paper
• Effects of remdesivir in patients hospitalised with COVID-19: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

  2023cites this paper
• Systemic THrombolysis Randomization IN Endovascular Stroke Therapy (SHRINE) Collaboration: a patient-level pooled analysis of the SKIP and DEVT Trials

  2023cites this paper
• Enteral supplementation with high-dose docosahexaenoic acid on the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very preterm infants: a collaborative study protocol for an individual participant data meta-analysis

  2023cites this paper
• Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects

  2023cites this paper
• Benefits and harms of perioperative high fraction inspired oxygen for surgical site infection prevention: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data of randomised controlled trials

  2023cites this paper
• The effect of balanced energy-protein supplementation provided to lactating women on maternal and infant outcomes: study protocol for a prospectively planned individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis

  2023cites this paper
• Association of Atrial Septal Aneurysm and Shunt Size With Stroke Recurrence and Benefit From Patent Foramen Ovale Closure.

  2022cites this paper
• How to observe the principle of concurrent control in an arm‐based meta‐analysis using SAS procedures GLIMMIX and BGLIMM

  2022cites this paper
• Efficacy of acupuncture in subpopulations with functional constipation: A protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

  2022cites this paper
• Diet and physical activity in pregnancy to prevent gestational diabetes: a protocol for an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis on the differential effects of interventions with economic evaluation

  2021cites this paper
• The effects of dietary and lifestyle interventions among pregnant women with overweight or obesity on early childhood outcomes: an individual participant data meta-analysis from randomised trials

  2021cites this paper
• Estimating interactions in individual participant data meta-analysis: a comparison of methods in practice

  2021cites this paper
• Sample size calculations for n-of-1 trials

  2021cites this paper
• Inferring the multiplicity of founder variants initiating HIV-1 infection: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.

  2021cites this paper
• Meta‐Analysis

  2021cites this paper
• Reducing Self-harm in Adolescents. An individual participant data meta-analysis (RISA-IPD): systematic review protocol

  2021cites this paper
• References

  year unknowncites this paper
• References

  year unknowncites this paper