Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2011

• Venue

  Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine

• Publication date

  2011-08-01

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/j.1756-5391.2011.01149.x
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials.

  2011cited by this paper

• Improving antibiotic use through behaviour change: a systematic review of interventions evaluated in low- and middle-income countries

  2021cites this paper
• The influence of depth of anesthesia and blood pressure on muscle recorded motor evoked potentials in spinal surgery. A prospective observational study protocol

  2021cites this paper
• Registry versus publication: discrepancy of primary outcomes and possible outcome reporting bias in child and adolescent mental health

  2021cites this paper
• From registration to publication: A study on Dutch academic randomized controlled trials

  2020cites this paper
• Transparency in reporting of phase 3 cancer clinical trial results

  2020cites this paper
• Methodological and reporting quality of non-inferiority randomized controlled trials comparing antibiotic therapies: a systematic review.

  2020cites this paper
• COMPare: Qualitative analysis of researchers’ responses to critical correspondence on a cohort of 58 misreported trials

  2019cites this paper
• COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time

  2019cites this paper
• A systematic review of comparisons between protocols or registrations and full reports in primary biomedical research

  2018cites this paper
• Reporting and publishing research in the biomedical sciences

  2018cites this paper
• Doug Altman's legacy to Cochrane and evidence synthesis.

  2018cites this paper
• Re: Parkes Weber syndrome: a case of right lower limb hypertrophy

  2018cites this paper
• Response to Re: Randomized clinical trial to assess the ideal mode of delivery for local anaesthetic abdominal wall blocks

  2018cites this paper
• Worldwide trends in volume and quality of published protocols of randomized controlled trials

  2017cites this paper
• Publishing protocols for trials of complex interventions before trial completion – potential pitfalls, solutions and the need for public debate

  2017cites this paper
• Methodological review: quality of randomized controlled trials in health literacy

  2016cites this paper
• Declaración SPIRIT 2013: definición de los elementos estándares del protocolo de un ensayo clínico*

  2015cites this paper
• Selective reporting in trials of high risk cardiovascular devices: cross sectional comparison between premarket approval summaries and published reports

  2015cites this paper
• An Assessment of the Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trial Reports Published in Prosthodontic and Implant Dentistry Journals.

  2015cites this paper
• Reporting in surgical research

  2015cites this paper
• Protocol registration and selective outcome reporting in recent psychiatry trials: new antidepressants and cognitive behavioural therapies

  2015cites this paper
• From Protocols to Publications: A Study in Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials in Oncology.

  2015cites this paper
• From pre-registration to publication: a non-technical primer for conducting a meta-analysis to synthesize correlational data

  2015cites this paper
• Why We Need Industrial–Organizational Psychology to Fix Industrial–Organizational Psychology

  2013cites this paper
• Evaluating adherence to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors' policy of mandatory, timely clinical trial registration.

  2013cites this paper
• Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review

  2013cites this paper
• The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews

  2012cites this paper