Panoramic radiograph – a useful tool to assess the difficulty of extraction of third molars

1 Department of Oral Surgery, Medical University of Gdańsk, Poland 2 Student Scientific Circle at the Department of Oral Surgery, Medical University of Gdańsk, Poland 3 Department of Radiology I, Medical University of Gdańsk, Poland 4 Department of Oral Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland 5 Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, Italy 6 Department of Oncology and Hematooncology, University of Milan, Italy

• Publication year

  2020

• Venue

  Unknown venue

• Publication date

  2020-09-16

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.31373/EJTCM/126928
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Impaction of lower third molars and their association with age: radiological perspectives

  2018cited by this paper
• Risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury with coronectomy vs surgical extraction of mandibular third molars—A comparison of two techniques and review of the literature

  2018cited by this paper
• Prevention of neurological injuries during mandibular third molar surgery: technical notes.

  2017cited by this paper
• An Assessment of Factors Influencing the Difficulty in Third Molar Surgery

  2017cited by this paper
• Difficulty index in extraction of impacted mandibular third molars and their post-operative complications

  2014influential reference
• Mandibular Third Molar Impaction: Review of Literature and a Proposal of a Classification

  2013cited by this paper
• New Concepts in Impacted Third Molar Surgery

  2013cited by this paper
• Is Pederson Index a True Predictive Difficulty Index for Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery? A Meta-analysis

  2013cited by this paper
• Maxillary third molar: patterns of impaction and their relation to oroantral perforation.

  2012cited by this paper
• Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty during removal of impacted lower third molars.

  2011influential reference
• 3-Dimensional imaging for lower third molars: is there an implication for surgical removal?

  2011cited by this paper
• Pederson scale fails to predict how difficult it will be to extract lower third molars.

  2007cited by this paper
• Estimating third molar extraction difficulty: a comparison of subjective and objective factors.

  2005cited by this paper
• How well do clinicians estimate third molar extraction difficulty?

  2005cited by this paper
• Risk factors for third molar extraction difficulty.

  2004cited by this paper
• Classification of surgical difficulty in extracting impacted third molars.

  2002influential reference
• Pell-Gregory classification is unreliable as a predictor of difficulty in extracting impacted lower third molars.

  2000influential reference
• Oral and maxillofacial surgery

  1988cited by this paper
• Impacted mandibular third molars.

  1968influential reference

• Utilidad de los métodos de evaluación dental por imagen más empleados en terceros molares incluidos: revisión bibliográfica

  2026cites this paper
• Development of an AI-Supported Clinical Tool for Assessing Mandibular Third Molar Tooth Extraction Difficulty Using Panoramic Radiographs and YOLO11 Sub-Models

  2025cites this paper
• Comparative assessment of difficulty scales for removal of the third molar of the lower jaw depending on its position

  2024cites this paper
• The Growth Factors in Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin (A-PRF) Reduce Postoperative Complications after Mandibular Third Molar Odontectomy

  2021cites this paper