In consequence of insect feeding and saponin application tested quinoa plants released large amounts of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to compare to control. For cv. ‘Faro’ these were the following components: (Z)-3-hexenal – (Z)-3-HAL, (E)-2-hexenal – (E)-2-HAL, (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol – (Z)-3-HOL, (E)-2-hexen-1-ol – (E)-2-HOL, (Z)-3-hexen-1-yl acetate – (Z)-3-HAC, 1-hexyl acetate – 1-HAC, (Z)-ocimene (Z)-OCI, benzyl acetate BAC, methyl salicylate MAT, βcaryophyllene – β-CAR, (E)-β–farnesene – (E)-β-FAR. Cv. ‘Puno’ released 7 VOCs and these were: (Z)-3-HAL, (Z)-3HOL, (Z)-3-HAC, (Z)-OCI, MAT, β-CAR, and (E)– β-FAR. The fragrance bouquet of the third of variety tested (cv. ‘Titicaca’) consisted of 6 components: (Z)-3-HAL, (E)-2-HAL, (E)-2-HOL, (Z)-3-HAC, (Z)-OCI, and β-CAR. In general, much larger VOCs emission was observed in plants after insect feeding compared to saponin applications and especially control.
Effect of Lugus sp. feeding and a Saponin application on volatiles released by quinoa
D. Piesik,K. Gęsiński,G. Lemańczyk,J. Bocianowski,B. Buszewski,K. Krawczyk
Published 2020 in Pakistan Journal of Botany
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2020
- Venue
Pakistan Journal of Botany
- Publication date
2020-12-15
- Fields of study
Agricultural and Food Sciences, Chemistry, Environmental Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-34 of 34 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-1 of 1 citing papers · Page 1 of 1