Effect of Lugus sp. feeding and a Saponin application on volatiles released by quinoa

D. Piesik,K. Gęsiński,G. Lemańczyk,J. Bocianowski,B. Buszewski,K. Krawczyk

Published 2020 in Pakistan Journal of Botany

ABSTRACT

In consequence of insect feeding and saponin application tested quinoa plants released large amounts of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to compare to control. For cv. ‘Faro’ these were the following components: (Z)-3-hexenal – (Z)-3-HAL, (E)-2-hexenal – (E)-2-HAL, (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol – (Z)-3-HOL, (E)-2-hexen-1-ol – (E)-2-HOL, (Z)-3-hexen-1-yl acetate – (Z)-3-HAC, 1-hexyl acetate – 1-HAC, (Z)-ocimene (Z)-OCI, benzyl acetate BAC, methyl salicylate MAT, βcaryophyllene – β-CAR, (E)-β–farnesene – (E)-β-FAR. Cv. ‘Puno’ released 7 VOCs and these were: (Z)-3-HAL, (Z)-3HOL, (Z)-3-HAC, (Z)-OCI, MAT, β-CAR, and (E)– β-FAR. The fragrance bouquet of the third of variety tested (cv. ‘Titicaca’) consisted of 6 components: (Z)-3-HAL, (E)-2-HAL, (E)-2-HOL, (Z)-3-HAC, (Z)-OCI, and β-CAR. In general, much larger VOCs emission was observed in plants after insect feeding compared to saponin applications and especially control.

PUBLICATION RECORD

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Venue

    Pakistan Journal of Botany

  • Publication date

    2020-12-15

  • Fields of study

    Agricultural and Food Sciences, Chemistry, Environmental Science

  • Identifiers
  • External record

    Open on Semantic Scholar

  • Source metadata

    Semantic Scholar

CITATION MAP

EXTRACTION MAP

CLAIMS

  • No claims are published for this paper.

CONCEPTS

  • No concepts are published for this paper.

REFERENCES

Showing 1-34 of 34 references · Page 1 of 1

CITED BY