Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text Abstract Objective: This study is aims to compare the anesthetic safety of propofol combined with etomidate for painless gastroscopy. Methods: Three hundred patients undergoing painless gastroscopy were randomly assigned to P, PE1, and PE2 groups. Patients were anesthetized with propofol (P group) or propofol combined with etomidate (volume ratio 1: 1, PE1 group; volume ratio 2: 1, PE2 group). The hemodynamics and adverse reactions were observed. The sleep quality satisfaction and nature of dreams were recorded. Results: Compared with pre-anesthesia, the mean arterial pressure and heart rate of the 3 groups were significantly slower during the examination and at the end of the examination. PE1 group had a higher incidence of muscle spasm, body moving, choking, and deglutition. The incidence of hypoxemia and injection pain was higher in P group. P and PE2 group had higher sleep quality satisfaction and dream incidence after awaking. However, there was no difference in the nature of dreams among 3 groups. Conclusion: Our data indicate that the combination of 10 ml 1.0% propofol and 5 ml 0.2% etomidate for painless gastroscopy reduces adverse reactions while not affecting the patients respiratory function. Moreover, it is safe and effective, which is worthy of clinical application and promotion.
Clinical observation of the combined use of propofol and etomidate in painless gastroscopy
Li-peng Hao,Xi-bei Hu,Bingqing Zhu,Wan-hong Li,Xiang Huang,F. Kang
Published 2020 in Medicine
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2020
- Venue
Medicine
- Publication date
2020-11-06
- Fields of study
Medicine
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-19 of 19 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-33 of 33 citing papers · Page 1 of 1