Does Selective Attention Influence the Octave Illusion?

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2005

• Venue

  Perception

• Publication date

  2005-02-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1068/p5164PMID 15832571
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Reply to “Reconsidering evidence for the suppression model of the octave illusion,” by C. D. Chambers, J. B. Mattingley, and S. A. Moss

  2004cited by this paper
• Reconsidering evidence for the suppression model of the octave illusion

  2004cited by this paper
• The octave illusion revisited again.

  2004cited by this paper
• The suppression model remains unsound: A reply to Deutsch

  2004cited by this paper
• The octave illusion revisited: suppression or fusion between ears?

  2002influential reference
• Effects of attention and unilateral neglect on auditory stream segregation.

  2001cited by this paper
• Auditory and visual objects.

  2001cited by this paper
• A comparison of monotic and dichotic complex-tone pitch perception in listeners with hearing loss.

  1999cited by this paper
• The integration of nonsimultaneous frequency components into a single virtual pitch.

  1999cited by this paper
• An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing

  1997influential reference
• Detection Theory: A User's Guide

  1991cited by this paper
• Analytic and synthetic pitch of two-tone complexes.

  1991cited by this paper
• Lateralization and sequential relationships in the octave illusion.

  1988cited by this paper
• Relative dominance of individual partials in determining the pitch of complex tones

  1985cited by this paper
• Central auditory processing: I. Ear dominance—A perceptual or an attentional asymmetry?☆

  1983cited by this paper
• The octave illusion in relation to handedness and familial handedness background.

  1983cited by this paper
• Central auditory processing. I. Ear dominance--a perceptual or an attentional asymmetry?

  1983cited by this paper
• Comments on ''Ear dominance and sequential interactions''[J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67, 220-228 (1980)]

  1982cited by this paper
• Pitch for nonsimultaneous successive harmonics in quiet and noise.

  1981cited by this paper
• Ear dominance and sequential interactions.

  1980cited by this paper
• Musical pitch of two-tone complexes and predictions by modern pitch theories.

  1979cited by this paper
• Lateralization by frequency for repeating sequences of dichotic 400- and 800-Hz tones.

  1978influential reference
• Separate "what" and "where" decision mechanisms in processing a dichotic tonal sequence.

  1976cited by this paper
• An auditory illusion

  1974cited by this paper
• Dichotic competition of simultaneous tone bursts of different frequency. I. Dissociation of pitch from lateralization and loudness.

  1974cited by this paper
• Pitch, consonance, and harmony.

  1974cited by this paper
• The perception of pitch.

  1974cited by this paper
• The Central Origin of the Pitch of Complex Tones: Evidence from Musical Interval Recognition

  1972cited by this paper
• Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

  1971influential reference
• Pitch of complex tones.

  1966cited by this paper
• The Psychology of Attention

  year unknowncited by this paper

• Involvement of ordinary what and where auditory cortical areas during illusory perception

  2018influential citation
• A frontal but not parietal neural correlate of auditory consciousness

  2014influential citation
• Theta power and coherence illustrate cerebral processing of octave illusion

  2014cites this paper
• The octave illusion and handedness: A replication of Deutsch’s 1974 study

  2013cites this paper
• Auditory cortical processing: Binaural interaction in healthy and ROBO1-deficient subjects

  2012cites this paper
• "Binaural rivalry": dichotic listening as a tool for the investigation of the neural correlate of consciousness.

  2011cites this paper
• “Octave illusion” or “Deutsch’s illusion”?

  2009cites this paper