From funding agencies to scientific agency

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2014

• Venue

  EMBO Reports

• Publication date

  2014-01-07

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Business

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1002/embr.201338068PMID 24397931PMCID PMC3989857
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Atlas of Knowledge: Anyone Can Map

  2016cited by this paper
• Visual Insights: A Practical Guide to Making Sense of Data

  2014cited by this paper
• Models of Science Dynamics

  2012cited by this paper
• VIVO: A Semantic Approach to Scholarly Networking and Discovery

  2012cited by this paper
• Atlas of Science: Visualizing What We Know

  2011cited by this paper
• Calm in a crisis

  2010cited by this paper
• PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks

  2009cited by this paper
• Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability.

  2008cited by this paper
• Statistical analysis of the National Institutes of Health peer review system

  2008cited by this paper
• Journal status

  2006cited by this paper
• Visualizing knowledge domains

  2005cited by this paper
• Mapping knowledge domains

  2004cited by this paper
• The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine

  1998cited by this paper
• Open Science and Closed Science: Tradeoffs in a Democracy

  1985cited by this paper
• Funding Science: The Real Defects of Peer Review and An Alternative To It

  1985cited by this paper

• Evolution of the computational science community: The dynamics of topics and collaborations in 24 years of ICCS and JoCS publications

  2025cites this paper
• Sustaining Research Computing and Cyberinfrastructure through Heterogeneous Funding and Collaboration

  2025cites this paper
• Peer review for funding decisions

  2025cites this paper
• The innovation trade-off: how following superstars shapes academic novelty

  2025cites this paper
• Funding and productivity: Does winning grants affect the scientific productivity of recipients? Evidence from the social sciences and economics

  2025cites this paper
• The distribution of scientific project funds model based on adaptive similarity fitting and NSGA-II

  2024influential citation
• A heart model of Earth Stewardship

  2024cites this paper
• Nobel Citation Effects on Scientific Publications: A Case Study in Physics

  2023cites this paper
• [Can we save biomedical research from the managerial model?]

  2023cites this paper
• Rethinking academia in a time of climate crisis

  2023cites this paper
• ‘Science by consensus’ impedes scientific creativity and progress: A simple alternative to funding biomedical research

  2023cites this paper
• Don't follow the leader: Independent thinkers create scientific innovation

  2023cites this paper
• Effective or predatory funding? Evaluating the hidden costs of grant applications

  2022cites this paper
• What works for peer review and decision-making in research funding: a realist synthesis

  2022cites this paper
• Snowmass '21 Community Engagement Frontier 6: Public Policy and Government Engagement: Congressional Advocacy for HEP Funding (The"DC Trip'')

  2022cites this paper
• Novel idea generation in social networks is optimized by exposure to a “Goldilocks” level of idea-variability

  2022cites this paper
• FENS‐Kavli Network of Excellence: Postponed, non‐competitive peer review for research funding

  2022cites this paper
• Does It Pay to Do Novel Science? The Selectivity Patterns in Science Funding

  2021cites this paper
• When zero may not be zero: A cautionary note on the use of inter‐rater reliability in evaluating grant peer review

  2021cites this paper
• The modified lottery: Formalizing the intrinsic randomness of research funding

  2021influential citation
• Should we fund research randomly? An epistemological criticism of the lottery model as an alternative to peer review for the funding of science

  2020cites this paper
• GotFunding: A grant recommendation system based on scientific articles

  2020cites this paper
• A basic model for empirical funding distributions

  2020cites this paper
• Science policies: How should science funding be allocated? An evolutionary biologists’ perspective

  2019cites this paper
• Concentration or dispersal of research funding?

  2019cites this paper
• Rethinking Resource Allocation in Science

  2019cites this paper
• Challenges of Designing and Implementing Simulation Models of Peer Review

  2019cites this paper
• Science Forecasts: Modeling and Communicating Developments in Science, Technology, and Innovation

  2019cites this paper
• Centralized Funding and Epistemic Exploration

  2019cites this paper
• Caractérisation et modélisation de la co-évolution des réseaux de transport et des territoires

  2018cites this paper
• Contest models highlight inherent inefficiencies of scientific funding competitions

  2018cites this paper
• A new paradigm for the scientific enterprise: nurturing the ecosystem

  2018cites this paper
• Theoretical research without projects

  2018cites this paper
• Optimal distribution of science funding

  2018cites this paper
• A new paradigm for science: nurturing the ecosystem

  2018cites this paper
• Advocating a radical change in policies and new models to secure freedom and efficiency in funding and communication of science

  2018cites this paper
• Uncertainty and Individual Discretion in Allocating Research Funds

  2018cites this paper
• Innovation at the Intersection of Alcohol and HIV Research

  2017cites this paper
• Novel processes and metrics for a scientific evaluation rooted in the principles of science - Version 1

  2017cites this paper
• Using democracy to award research funding: an observational study

  2017cites this paper
• How much would each researcher receive if competitive government research funding were distributed equally among researchers?

  2017cites this paper
• Peer Review Practices for Evaluating Biomedical Research Grants: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

  2017cites this paper
• Erratum: “Excellence R Us”: university research and the fetishisation of excellence

  2017cites this paper
• Event Analytics for Innovation Trajectories: Understanding Inputs and Outcomes for Entrepreneurial Success

  2017cites this paper
• Rebooting science? Implications of science 2.0 main trends for scientific method and research institutions

  2016cites this paper
• External Funding of Doctoral Education: Background and Reflection

  2016cites this paper
• Time to tackle the incumbency advantage in science

  2016cites this paper
• The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise

  2016cites this paper
• Research Funding: the Case for a Modified Lottery

  2016cites this paper
• A Valentine's Day bouquet for Temperature readers: pleasing with prizes, searching for the right words, and keeping things mysterious

  2015cites this paper
• Analysis of Emerging Reputation and Funding Mechanisms in the Context of Open Science 2.0

  2015cites this paper
• Menage a Quoi? Optimal Number of Peer Reviewers

  2015cites this paper
• Why we still need grant peer review

  2014cites this paper
• Expert Evaluation in the Flow of Information Science

  2014cites this paper
• The Importance of Small Teams in the Big Science Era

  year unknowncites this paper
• Blockchain ​ for Open Science and Knowledge Creation A technical solution to the reproducibility crisis

  year unknowncites this paper
• Blockchain ​ for Science and Knowledge Creation

  year unknowncites this paper
• UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Science policies: How should science funding be allocated? An evolutionary biologists' perspective

  year unknowncites this paper