Advancing Best Practices for Aversion Conditioning (Humane Hazing) to Mitigate Human–Coyote Conflicts in Urban Areas

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2020

• Venue

  Human–Wildlife Interactions

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Environmental Science, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.26077/5CBF-F8F9
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Interactions with humans shape coyote responses to hazing

  2019cited by this paper
• Public perspectives on the management of urban coyotes

  2019cited by this paper
• Mapping the expansion of coyotes (Canis latrans) across North and Central America

  2018cited by this paper
• Patterns of wild carnivore attacks on humans in urban areas

  2018cited by this paper
• The global impacts of domestic dogs on threatened vertebrates

  2017cited by this paper
• Environmental factors influencing the occurrence of coyotes and conflicts in urban areas

  2017cited by this paper
• Reproductive characteristics of a coyote population before and during exploitation

  2017cited by this paper
• International consensus principles for ethical wildlife control

  2017cited by this paper
• Carnivore conservation: shifting the paradigm from control to coexistence

  2017cited by this paper
• Using resident-based hazing programs to reduce human–coyote conflicts in urban environments

  2017influential reference
• Effectiveness of verbal and gestural signals and familiarity with signal-senders on the performance of working dogs

  2017cited by this paper
• Coexisting with coyotes (Canis latrans) in an urban environment

  2016influential reference
• The importance of gestural communication: a study of human–dog communication using incongruent information

  2016cited by this paper
• The Problematic Trend of Pseudo-Science Dictating Urban Coyote Management Policy

  2016cited by this paper
• Evaluating lethal and nonlethal management options for urban coyotes

  2016influential reference
• Predator control should not be a shot in the dark

  2016cited by this paper
• Parks, Dogs, and Beaches: Human-Wildlife Conflict and the Politics of Place

  2015cited by this paper
• Shifts in Attitudes Toward Coyotes on the Urbanized East Coast: The Cape Cod Experience, 2005–2012

  2015cited by this paper
• Greater consumption of protein-poor anthropogenic food by urban relative to rural coyotes increases diet breadth and potential for human–wildlife conflict

  2015cited by this paper
• A review of the interactions between free-roaming domestic dogs and wildlife

  2013cited by this paper
• Discrimination of familiar human faces in dogs (Canis familiaris)

  2013cited by this paper
• The Suburban Coyote Syndrome, From Anecdote To Evidence: Understanding Ecology And Human Safety To Improve Coexistence

  2012cited by this paper
• Assessment of Human-Coyote Conflicts: City and County of Broomfield, Colorado

  2011cited by this paper
• Coyote (Canis latrans) Interactions With Humans and Pets Reported in the Canadian Print Media (1995–2010)

  2011cited by this paper
• Is the Urban Coyote a Misanthropic Synanthrope? The C ase from Chicago

  2011cited by this paper
• Human–Coyote Interactions in Calgary, Alberta

  2011cited by this paper
• Portrayal of Interactions Between Humans and Coyotes (Canis latrans): Content Analysis of Canadian Print Media (1998-2010)

  2011cited by this paper
• Is Wildlife Going to the Dogs? Impacts of Feral and Free-Roaming Dogs on Wildlife Populations

  2011cited by this paper
• Bold, shy, and persistent: Variable coyote response to light and sound stimuli

  2009cited by this paper
• Coyote Attacks on Humans in the United States and Canada

  2009cited by this paper
• The Effects of Dogs on Wildlife Communities

  2008cited by this paper
• MANAGEMENT OF URBAN COYOTES AND ATTACKS IN GREEN VALLEY, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA

  2007cited by this paper
• A REVIEW OF SUCCESSFUL URBAN COYOTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS IMPLEMENTED TO PREVENT OR REDUCE ATTACKS ON HUMANS AND PETS IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

  2007cited by this paper
• Bad Dogs: Why Do Coyotes and Other Canids Become Unruly?

  2007cited by this paper
• Public Attitudes Toward Lethal Coyote Control

  2006cited by this paper
• Coyotes and Humans: Can We Coexist?

  2006cited by this paper
• Non-lethal Alternatives for Predation Management

  2004cited by this paper
• Human‐Carnivore Conflict and Perspectives on Carnivore Management Worldwide

  2003cited by this paper
• Aversive and disruptive stimulus applications for managing predation

  2000cited by this paper
• Coyote depredation control: an interface between biology and management

  1999cited by this paper
• Unites States Public Attitudes Regarding Predators and Their Management to Enhance Avian Recruitment

  1999cited by this paper
• Standards for lethal response to problem urban wildlife

  1998cited by this paper
• Management of Conflicts Between Urban Coyotes and Humans in Southern California

  1998cited by this paper
• The ability of dogs to recognize and cross-match human odours.

  1994cited by this paper
• Simulations of Demographic Compensation in Coyote Populations

  1983cited by this paper
• A Comparative Study of the Development of Facial Expressions in Canids; Wolf, Coyote and Foxes

  1970cited by this paper

• Use of a public questionnaire to evaluate human-wildlife conflict and the efficacy of nonlethal wildlife deterrents: Lessons from a desert city

  2026cites this paper
• Morphological and Genetic Assessments of Coyote Diet in Qualla Boundary, North Carolina, Show Interaction with Humans

  2025cites this paper
• Not just ‘super‐predators': human behaviour shapes wildlife behavioural responses across avoidance, tolerance and attraction

  2025cites this paper
• Rapid systematic literature review: Camera trap sampling in ecological studies: Considerations of wildlife welfare.

  2025cites this paper
• Urban coyotes were observed rarely and retreated consistently from assertive approaches by volunteers in neighborhoods

  2025cites this paper
• Engaging urban residents in the appropriate actions to mitigate human–wildlife conflicts

  2024cites this paper
• Coexistence across space and time: Social‐ecological patterns within a decade of human‐coyote interactions in San Francisco

  2023cites this paper
• Proactive use of intensive aversive conditioning increases probability of retreat by coyotes

  2023cites this paper
• Lessons for becoming bison wise and bear aware in Elk Island National Park

  2023cites this paper
• A report of short-term aversive conditioning on a wolf documented through telemetry

  2023cites this paper
• Toward a More-Than-Human Everyday Urbanism: Rhythms and Sensoria in the Multispecies City

  2022cites this paper
• Individual animal geographies for the more-than-human city: Storying synanthropy and cynanthropy with urban coyotes

  2021cites this paper