Comparison of Decisions under Unknown Experiments

Andrew Caplin,Daniel Martin

Published 2021 in Journal of Political Economy

ABSTRACT

We take the perspective of an econometrician who wants to determine which of two experiments provides higher expected utility but only knows the decisions under each experiment. To compare these decisions, the econometrician must make inferences about what the experiment might have been for each set of decisions. We provide a necessary and sufficient condition that identifies when every experiment consistent with one set of decisions has a higher value of information than every experiment consistent with the other set of decisions.

PUBLICATION RECORD

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Venue

    Journal of Political Economy

  • Publication date

    2021-06-25

  • Fields of study

    Not labeled

  • Identifiers
  • External record

    Open on Semantic Scholar

  • Source metadata

    Semantic Scholar

CITATION MAP

EXTRACTION MAP

CLAIMS

  • No claims are published for this paper.

CONCEPTS

  • No concepts are published for this paper.

REFERENCES

Showing 1-27 of 27 references · Page 1 of 1