Here Comes the Judge: The Influence of Judge Personal Characteristics on Federal Sexual Harassment Case Outcomes

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2003

• Venue

  Law and Human Behavior

• Publication date

  2003-02-01

• Fields of study

  Law, Medicine, Political Science, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1023/A:1021678912133PMID 12647468
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The Reasonable Woman Standard: Effects on Sexual Harassment Court Decisions

  2004cited by this paper
• A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment.

  2001cited by this paper
• Outcomes of Requests for Summary Judgments in Federal Sexual Harassment Cases: Policy Capturing Revisited

  2001cited by this paper
• Situational and Individual Influences on Judgments of Hostile Environment Sexual Harassment1

  1999influential reference
• What Juries Can't Do Well: The Jury's Performance as a Risk Manager

  1998cited by this paper
• The Impact of Job Performance, Gender, and Ethnicity on the Managerial Review of Sexual Harassment Allegations1

  1998cited by this paper
• Research on Gender and the Law: Where Are We Going, Where Have We Been?

  1998cited by this paper
• The Reasonable Woman Standard: A Meta-Analytic Review of Gender Differences in Perceptions of Sexual Harassment

  1998cited by this paper
• Sexual harassment and gender differences.

  1998cited by this paper
• Employment interview on trial: Linking interview structure with litigation outcomes.

  1997cited by this paper
• Sexual harassment: factors affecting attitudes and perceptions

  1997cited by this paper
• Sexual Harassment and Women of Color: Issues, Challenges, and Future Directions

  1996cited by this paper
• The relationship between age and gender in workers' attitudes toward sexual harassment.

  1996cited by this paper
• Sexual harassment in the workplace: Perspectives, frontiers, and response strategies.

  1996cited by this paper
• "I've Been there, Too": Effect on Empathy of Prior Experience with a Need

  1996influential reference
• Impact of Ethnicity, Gender, and Previous Experience on Juror Judgments in Sexual Harassment Cases1

  1996cited by this paper
• Politics and Judgment in Federal District Courts

  1996influential reference
• "Attitudinal" Decision Making in the Federal Courts: A Study of Constitutional Self-Representation Claims

  1996cited by this paper
• Social Science Research on Lay Definitions of Sexual Harassment

  1995cited by this paper
• How Subjective Is Sexual Harassment? An Examination of Rater Effects

  1995influential reference
• An Exploratory Study of the Reasonable Woman Standard: Gender-Bias in Interpreting Actionable Sexual Harassment

  1995cited by this paper
• Diversifying the Judiciary: The Influence of Gender and Race of Judging

  1994cited by this paper
• CLINTON NONTRADITIONAL JUDGES - CREATING A MORE REPRESENTATIVE BENCH

  1994cited by this paper
• Heuristic Processing in Organizational Judgments

  1994cited by this paper
• Ironic processes of mental control.

  1994cited by this paper
• The Legal, Ethical, and Social Implications of the "Reasonable Woman" Standard in Sexual Harassment Cases

  1993cited by this paper
• “EXTRACTING” POLICY FROM JUDICIAL OPINIONS: THE DANGERS OF POLICY CAPTURING IN A FIELD SETTING

  1993influential reference
• Outcomes of Federal Court Decisions on Sexual Harassment

  1992cited by this paper
• Determinants of judgments of and responses to a complaint of sexual harassment

  1991influential reference
• Perceptions of sexual harassment: a re-examination of gender differences.

  1990cited by this paper
• Attributions of responsibility for an incident of sexual harassment in a university setting

  1989influential reference
• Outcomes of Sexual Harassment Charges

  1988cited by this paper
• Interpretations of sexual harassment: An attributional analysis

  1988cited by this paper
• THE AGE OF JUDGES - REAGAN 2ND-TERM APPOINTEES

  1987cited by this paper
• Models of State High Court Decision Making in Sex Discrimination Cases

  1986cited by this paper
• The Diversification of the Federal Bench: Policy and Process Ramifications

  1985influential reference
• Sexual Assault and Harassment: A Campus Community Case Study

  1982cited by this paper
• Women as Policymakers: The Case of Trial Judges

  1981cited by this paper
• Should There Be Affirmative Action for the Judiciary

  1979cited by this paper
• Black Elite Decision Making: The Case of Trial Judges

  1978cited by this paper
• Political Correlates of the Behavior of Federal District Judges: A "Best Case" Analysis

  1978influential reference
• Appellate Courts and Lawyers: Information Gathering in the Adversary System

  1978cited by this paper
• Sisterhood in the Courtroom: Sex of Judge and Defendant as Factors in Criminal Case Disposition: An Interdisciplinary Collection

  1977cited by this paper
• Exploring the Conservatism of Federal Appeals Court Judges

  1976influential reference

• Do Companies Care about Judicial Ideology? Evidence from Air Pollution

  2024cites this paper
• Language and the use of law are predictive of judge gender and seniority

  2024cites this paper
• The Pervasive Influence of Ideology at the Federal Circuit Courts

  2023cites this paper
• Association and causation: Attributes and effects of judges in equal employment opportunity commission litigation outcomes

  2023cites this paper
• A collaboration between judge and machine to reduce legal uncertainty in disputes concerning ex aequo et bono compensations

  2022cites this paper
• The Impact of Racial Representation on Judicial Legitimacy: White Reactions to Latinos on the Bench

  2022cites this paper
• The Effects of Judge Race and Sex on Pretrial Detention Decisions

  2021cites this paper
• Giving Virtuous People the License to Harass: The Role of Responsibility-Focused Power Embodiment and Moral Licensing on Sexual Harassment Perceptions

  2021cites this paper
• Latino Judges on the Federal District Court: ¿Cómo Deciden?

  2020cites this paper
• Judge political affiliation and impacts of corporate environmental litigation

  2020cites this paper
• Are judges influenced by legally irrelevant circumstances?

  2020cites this paper
• Does gender diversity in panels of judges matter? Evidence from French child support cases

  2020cites this paper
• The Intersectionality of Age and Gender on the Bench: Are Younger Female Judges Harsher with Serious Crimes?

  2020cites this paper
• Judicial behavior in disability cases: do judge sex and race matter?

  2020cites this paper
• Gender differences in the prosecution of police assault: Evidence from a natural experiment in Sweden

  2020cites this paper
• Gender-based judicial ingroup bias in sex crime sentencing: Evidence from Belgium

  2020cites this paper
• Evidence from French Labor Courts

  2019influential citation
• Does Gender Matter in the Production of Judges? Evidence From the Brazilian Judiciary

  2019cites this paper
• How leaders perceive employee deviance: Blaming victims while excusing favorites.

  2019cites this paper
• Determinants of in-court settlements: empirical evidence from a German trial court

  2018cites this paper
• Case selection and judicial decision-making: evidence from French labor courts

  2018cites this paper
• Partisan Bias in Responses to Sexual Misconduct Allegations against Male Politicians

  2018cites this paper
• Equal Law, Unequal Process: How Context and Judges Shape Equal Opportunity Decision-Making in the Courts Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts

  2017influential citation
• Preventing and correcting workplace harassment: Guidelines for employers

  2017cites this paper
• (Un)Equal Justice Under Law: Analyzing the Impact of Gender Synchrony and Muslim Religion on Asylum Outcomes in the United States

  2017cites this paper
• Judicial decision making under changing legal standards: The case of dismissal arbitration

  2017cites this paper
• When the Shadow Is the Substance: Judge Gender and the Outcomes of Workplace Sex Discrimination Cases

  2017cites this paper
• Why Are Conservatives More Punitive Than Liberals? A Moral Foundations Approach

  2017cites this paper
• On Getting Inside the Judge’s Mind

  2017cites this paper
• If you judge, investigate! Responsibility reduces confirmatory information processing in legal experts.

  2016cites this paper
• The Case for Symmetry in Antidiscrimination Law

  2016cites this paper
• Politics , the Judiciary , and the Arbitration of Unfair Dismissal Disputes

  2016cites this paper
• Representation on the Courts? The Effects of Trial Judges’ Sex and Race

  2016cites this paper
• Perceptions of credibility of sexual abuse victims across generations.

  2016cites this paper
• Does gender matter in the civil law judiciary? Evidence from French child support court decisions

  2016cites this paper
• Identifying Judicial Empathy: Does Having Daughters Cause Judges to Rule for Women's Issues?

  2015cites this paper
• Is Justice Really Blind? Race and Reversal in US Courts

  2015cites this paper
• Individual Employment Rights Arbitration in the United States

  2015cites this paper
• Dismissal Laws in Australia: Reforms and Enforcement by Labour Courts

  2015cites this paper
• Anti-harassment policy, manager integrity and intention to report customer sexual harassment

  2015cites this paper
• Judges’ perception on causes of criminality and justifications for crime

  2015cites this paper
• Is Justice Really Blind? Race and Appellate Review in U.S. Courts

  2015cites this paper
• Essays on Health and Labor Markets

  2015cites this paper
• Determinants of In-Court Settlements

  2015cites this paper
• An Empirical Analysis Of Non-legal Factors Influencing Judging In Student-initiated Sex Discrimination Suits In Higher Education

  2014cites this paper
• Sentence pronouncements: What judges say when sentencing

  2014cites this paper
• Inferences from Litigated Cases

  2014cites this paper
• Non-legal Factors Influencing Judging In United States Courts Of Appeal In Higher Education Sex Discrimination In Employment Cases

  2014influential citation
• Not Just the Facts: Adjudicator Bias and Decisions of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (2006–2011)

  2013cites this paper
• She’ll Settle It?

  2013influential citation
• Toga Party: The Political Basis of Judicial Investigations against MPs in Italy (1983–2013)

  2013cites this paper
• Judges on Trial

  2012cites this paper
• Communicating violence risk: Judicial decision making in involuntary civil commitments

  2012cites this paper
• Vacating of Arbitration Awards as Diminishment of Conflict Resolution

  2012cites this paper
• The Psychology of Trial Judging

  2011cites this paper
• Aversive racism and implicit biases in civil rights workers in the United States

  2011cites this paper
• Discrimination in the 21st century: Are science and the law aligned?

  2011cites this paper
• Race and Ethnicity in the Juvenile Justice System

  2010cites this paper
• JUDGES' UNEQUAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO EXTRALEGAL DISPARITIES IN IMPRISONMENT*

  2010cites this paper
• Judicial Attributes and Sentencing-Deviation Cases: Do Sex, Race, and Politics Matter?

  2010cites this paper
• The Impact of Panel Composition on Sex Discrimination Case Outcomes at the U.S. Circuit Courts

  2009cites this paper
• What Legal Protections Do Victims of Bullies in the Workplace Have

  2009cites this paper
• From Charm to Harm: A Content‐Analytic Review of Sexual Harassment Court Cases Involving Workplace Romance

  2008cites this paper
• Identifying factors that produce blame for sexually harassing behavior

  2008cites this paper
• THE MULTILEVEL CONTEXT OF CRIMINAL SENTENCING: INTEGRATING JUDGE- AND COUNTY-LEVEL INFLUENCES *

  2006cites this paper
• THIRD-PARTY REACTIONS TO EMPLOYEE (MIS)TREATMENT: A JUSTICE PERSPECTIVE

  2004cites this paper
• Evaluating Judges I. the Limits of Our Present Knowledge on the Descriptive-normative Gap Ii. Alternative Normative Perspectives on Judging

  year unknowncites this paper