Clinical prediction models (CPMs) have become fundamental for risk stratification across healthcare. The CPM pipeline (development, validation, deployment, and impact assessment) is commonly viewed as a one-time activity, with model updating rarely considered and done in a somewhat ad hoc manner. This fails to address the fact that the performance of a CPM worsens over time as natural changes in populations and care pathways occur. CPMs need constant surveillance to maintain adequate predictive performance. Rather than reactively updating a developed CPM once evidence of deteriorated performance accumulates, it is possible to proactively adapt CPMs whenever new data becomes available. Approaches for validation then need to be changed accordingly, making validation a continuous rather than a discrete effort. As such, “living” (dynamic) CPMs represent a paradigm shift, where the analytical methods dynamically generate updated versions of a model through time; one then needs to validate the system rather than each subsequent model revision.
Continual updating and monitoring of clinical prediction models: time for dynamic prediction systems?
David A. Jenkins,G. Martin,M. Sperrin,R. Riley,T. Debray,G. Collins,N. Peek
Published 2021 in Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2021
- Venue
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
- Publication date
2021-01-11
- Fields of study
Medicine
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-38 of 38 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-90 of 90 citing papers · Page 1 of 1