The use of crowdworkers in NLP research is growing rapidly, in tandem with the exponential increase in research production in machine learning and AI. Ethical discussion regarding the use of crowdworkers within the NLP research community is typically confined in scope to issues related to labor conditions such as fair pay. We draw attention to the lack of ethical considerations related to the various tasks performed by workers, including labeling, evaluation, and production. We find that the Final Rule, the common ethical framework used by researchers, did not anticipate the use of online crowdsourcing platforms for data collection, resulting in gaps between the spirit and practice of human-subjects ethics in NLP research. We enumerate common scenarios where crowdworkers performing NLP tasks are at risk of harm. We thus recommend that researchers evaluate these risks by considering the three ethical principles set up by the Belmont Report. We also clarify some common misconceptions regarding the Institutional Review Board (IRB) application. We hope this paper will serve to reopen the discussion within our community regarding the ethical use of crowdworkers.
Beyond Fair Pay: Ethical Implications of NLP Crowdsourcing
Boaz Shmueli,Jan Fell,Soumya Ray,Lun-Wei Ku
Published 2021 in North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2021
- Venue
North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
- Publication date
2021-04-20
- Fields of study
Law, Computer Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-50 of 50 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-91 of 91 citing papers · Page 1 of 1