SCIENCE@home

A Prognostic Model for Predicting One-Month Outcomes among Emergency Department Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and a Presenting Glasgow Coma Scale of Fifteen

Hayley Falk,Kathleen T Bechtold,M. Peters,D. Roy,V. Rao,Mariel S. Lavieri,H. Sair,Timothy Van Meter,F. Korley

Published 2021 in Journal of Neurotrauma

ABSTRACT

The lack of well-performing prognostic models for early prognostication of outcomes remains a major barrier to improving the clinical care of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). We aimed to derive a prognostic model for predicting incomplete recovery at 1-month in emergency department (ED) patients with mTBI and a presenting Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 15 who were enrolled in the HeadSMART (Head Injury Serum Markers for Assessing Response to Trauma) study. The derivation cohort included 355 participants with complete baseline (day-of-injury) and follow-up data. The primary outcome measure was the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) at 1-month and incomplete recovery was defined as a GOSE <8. At 1-month post-injury, incomplete recovery was present in 58% (n = 205) of participants. The final multi-variable logistic regression model included six variables: age in years (odds ratio [OR] = 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97-1.00), positive head CT (OR = 4.42; 95% CI: 2.21-9.33), history of depression (OR = 2.59; 95% CI: 1.47-4.69), and self-report of moderate or severe headache (OR = 2.49; 95% CI: 1.49-4.18), difficulty concentrating (OR = 3.17; 95% CI: 1.53-7.04), and photophobia (OR = 4.17; 95% CI: 2.08-8.92) on the day-of-injury. The model was validated internally using bootstrap resampling (1000 resamples), which revealed a mean over-optimism value of 0.01 and an optimism-corrected area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75-0.85). A prognostic model for predicting incomplete recovery among ED patients with mTBI and a presenting GCS of 15 using easily obtainable clinical and demographic variables has acceptable discriminative accuracy. External validation of this model is warranted.

PUBLICATION RECORD

CITATION MAP

EXTRACTION MAP

CLAIMS

  • No claims are published for this paper.

CONCEPTS

  • No concepts are published for this paper.

REFERENCES

Showing 1-64 of 64 references · Page 1 of 1

CITED BY

Showing 1-24 of 24 citing papers · Page 1 of 1