Crank That Feed: A Physical Intervention for Active Twitter Users

Passively consuming digital social media content often precludes users from mindfully considering the value they derive from such experiences as they engage in them. We present a system for using Twitter that requires users to continuously turn a hand crank to power their social media screen. We evaluate the device and its effects on how users value Twitter with 3 participants over 3 weeks, with the middle week of Twitter usage directed exclusively through our system. Using our device caused a dramatic decrease in Twitter usage for all participants, which either persisted or rebounded in the post-intervention week. Our analysis of diary studies and qualitative interviews surfaced three themes indicating shifting focus on content, shifting awareness about the role of social media, and new social dynamics around content-sharing.

• Publication year

  2021

• Venue

  CHI Extended Abstracts

• Publication date

  2021-05-08

• Fields of study

  Computer Science, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1145/3411763.3451817
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Designing for Digital Detox: Making Social Media Less Addictive with Digital Nudges

  2020cited by this paper
• What Makes Smartphone Use Meaningful or Meaningless?

  2018cited by this paper
• "I'm an Addict" and Other Sensemaking Devices: A Discourse Analysis of Self-Reflections on Lived Experience of Social Media

  2017cited by this paper
• It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens

  2015cited by this paper
• Counterfunctional things: exploring possibilities in designing digital limitations

  2014cited by this paper
• The reflexive printer: toward making sense of perceived drawbacks in technology-mediated reminiscence

  2014cited by this paper
• Designing for slowness, anticipation and re-visitation: a long term field study of the photobox

  2014cited by this paper
• (How) will the revolution be retweeted?: information diffusion and the 2011 Egyptian uprising

  2012cited by this paper
• How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design

  2006cited by this paper
• Where the Action Is - The Foundations of Embodied Interaction

  2004cited by this paper
• What we talk about when we talk about context

  2004cited by this paper
• Slow Technology – Designing for Reflection

  2001cited by this paper
• Where the action is

  2001cited by this paper
• Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms

  1997cited by this paper

• Back to the 1990s, BeeperRedux!: Revisiting Retro Technology to Reflect Communication Quality and Experience in the Digital Age

  2025cites this paper
• A Longitudinal In-the-Wild Investigation of Design Frictions to Prevent Smartphone Overuse

  2024cites this paper
• Attention Receipts: Utilizing the Materiality of Receipts to Improve Screen-time Reflection on YouTube

  2024cites this paper
• Feminist Interaction Techniques: Social Consent Signals to Deter NCIM Screenshots

  2024cites this paper
• Health stigma on Twitter: investigating the prevalence and type of stigma communication in tweets about different conditions and disorders

  2023cites this paper
• Slowing it Down: Towards Facilitating Interpersonal Mindfulness in Online Polarizing Conversations Over Social Media

  2023cites this paper
• Making Crank-Powered Interactions: Methods, Demonstrators, Materials

  2022cites this paper
• Achieving Digital Wellbeing Through Digital Self-control Tools: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  2022influential citation
• Integrating Living Organisms in Devices to Implement Care-based Interactions

  2022cites this paper
• Auggie: Encouraging Effortful Communication through Handcrafted Digital Experiences

  2022cites this paper