Digital tools that support creative activities are ubiquitous in the design industry, yet practitioners appear to prefer pen and paper for design ideation. To better understand this exception, we conducted a comparative study between analog and digital tools and their impact on the divergent and convergent thinking patterns of groups of designers. We analysed how 24 participants solved comparable design ideation tasks in two conditions using linkographic protocol analysis – a notation method that focuses on identifying and linking small steps in the design process called moves. Our findings suggest that digital ideation tools yield more convergent thinking compared to analog tools, with no discernible impact on general productivity or divergent thinking.
How Digital Tools Impact Convergent and Divergent Thinking in Design Ideation
Jonas Frich,Midas Nouwens,Kim Halskov,P. Dalsgaard
Published 2021 in International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2021
- Venue
International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publication date
2021-05-06
- Fields of study
Computer Science, Engineering
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-38 of 38 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-47 of 47 citing papers · Page 1 of 1