Erratum for Crossette et al., “Metagenomic Quantification of Genes with Internal Standards”

Emily Crossette,Jordan Gumm,Kathryn Langenfeld,L. Raskin,M. Duhaime,K. Wigginton

Published 2021 in mBio

ABSTRACT

ORIGINAL TEXT Incorporating internal standard spike-ins, as commonly used in analytical chemistry, can establish a ratio of metagenomic read abundance to gene copy concentration. Internal standard protocols were first applied to sequencing methods in transcriptomic experiments (RNA-seq) to quantify gene expression, identify protocol-dependent biases, and compare method sensitivity and reproducibility (17). Since then, protocols have been developed for 16S rRNA gene-amplicon (18) metagenome (19), and metatranscriptome (16) sequencing. Previous quantitative metagenomic spike-in studies have performed metagenome assemblies and then mapped short metagenomic reads to the assembled contigs (20). Such assembly-dependent methods are time-intensive and can fail to assemble genomes that harbor ARGs, particularly those of viruses (21) or plasmids and within genomic islands (22, 23), thus increasing false-negative detection rates. Additionally, assemblies can introduce bias toward highly abundant organisms, which are more likely to be assembled correctly (24).

PUBLICATION RECORD

CITATION MAP

EXTRACTION MAP

CLAIMS

  • No claims are published for this paper.

CONCEPTS

  • No concepts are published for this paper.