Missing the rarest: is the positive interspecific abundance–distribution relationship a truly general macroecological pattern?

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2009

• Venue

  Biology Letters

• Publication date

  2009-08-23

• Fields of study

  Biology, Medicine, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0282PMID 19443509PMCID PMC2781936
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES

  2008cited by this paper
• Negative density-distribution relationship in butterflies

  2005cited by this paper
• Density–distribution relationships in British butterflies. I. The effect of mobility and spatial scale

  2001cited by this paper
• Density–distribution relationships in British butterflies. II. An assessment of mechanisms

  2001cited by this paper
• The scale of resource specialization and the distribution and abundance of lycaenid butterflies

  2000cited by this paper
• Pattern and Process in Macroecology

  2000cited by this paper
• Species extinction and the relationship between distribution and abundance

  1998cited by this paper
• Interspecific abundance-range size relationships: An appraisal of mechanisms

  1997cited by this paper
• Distribution and abundance of butterflies in a mountain area in the northern Iberian peninsula

  1995influential reference
• Rarity in Neotropical Forest Mammals and Its Ecological Correlates

  1990cited by this paper
• Effects of scale and habitat on the relationship between regional distribution and local abundance

  1990cited by this paper
• Relationships between distribution, abundance and foraging specialization in Australian landbirds

  1990cited by this paper

• Demography and dispersal influence the relationship between habitat suitability and population density

  2026cites this paper
• Landscape structure and species life history affect abundance-occupancy relationships.

  2025cites this paper
• Decoupling both local and global abundance from global range size, challenging the abundance-occupancy relationship in birds

  2025cites this paper
• Effects of occupancy estimation on abundance–occupancy relationships

  2022cites this paper
• Weak but consistent abundance–occupancy relationships across taxa, space and time

  2022cites this paper
• Temporal sampling and abundance measurement influences support for occupancy–abundance relationships

  2019cites this paper
• Resource use of wood-inhabiting fungi in different boreal forest types

  2017cites this paper
• Population density-range size relationship revisited

  2017cites this paper
• Abundance-area relationships in bird assemblages along an Afrotropical elevational gradient: space limitation in montane forest selects for higher population densities

  2016cites this paper
• Generalist-specialist continuum and life history traits of Central European butterflies (Lepidoptera) - are we missing a part of the picture?

  2014cites this paper
• A comparison of three statistical methods for analysing extinction threat status

  2013cites this paper
• Traits of butterfly communities change from specialist to generalist characteristics with increasing land-use intensity

  2013cites this paper
• Occurrence and abundance models of threatened plant species: Applications to mitigate the impact of hydroelectric power dams

  2012cites this paper
• Varying Definitions of Abundance and Incomplete Assemblages Challenge the Generality of the Interspecific Abundance—Distribution Relationships

  2011influential citation
• Explaining abundance-occupancy relationships in specialists and generalists: a case study on aquatic macroinvertebrates in standing waters.

  2010cites this paper
• Positive Density—Distribution Relationship in Finnish Butterflies

  2010influential citation
• On the obvious positive interspecific relationship between abundance and distribution: a reply to Blackburn and Gaston

  2009cites this paper
• On the obvious positive interspecific relationship between abundance and distribution: a reply to Blackburn and Gaston

  2009cites this paper
• Sometimes the obvious answer is the right one: a response to ‘Missing the rarest: is the positive interspecific abundance–distribution relationship a truly general macroecological pattern?’

  2009cites this paper