A Coherentist Justification of Epistemic Principles and Its Merits

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2021

• Venue

  Acta Analytica

• Publication date

  2021-09-07

• Fields of study

  Philosophy

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s12136-021-00463-3
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Epistemic Circularity

  2020cited by this paper
• Is epistemic circularity a fallacy?

  2020cited by this paper
• Gupta on Sellars’s Theory of Perception

  2019cited by this paper
• Method Coherence and Epistemic Circularity

  2019influential reference
• A ‘Doxastic Practice’ Approach to Epistemology

  2019cited by this paper
• The Truth-Conduciveness Problem of Coherentism and a Sellarsian Explanatory Coherence Theory

  2017cited by this paper
• 4. A “Doxastic Practice” Approach to Epistemology

  2017cited by this paper
• The Fundamental Questions Of Philosophy

  2016cited by this paper
• Epistemic Principles and Epistemic Circularity

  2014cited by this paper
• On Epistemic Entitlement (II): Welfare State Epistemology

  2014cited by this paper
• On Epistemic Entitlement (II)

  2014cited by this paper
• Skepticism, Evidence and Entitlement†

  2013cited by this paper
• Stakes, withholding, and pragmatic encroachment on knowledge

  2012cited by this paper
• Replies to Ram Neta, James Van Cleve, and Crispin Wright for a book symposium on reflective knowledge (OUP, 2009)

  2011cited by this paper
• Knowledge in an Uncertain World

  2009cited by this paper
• Entitlement as a response to I–II–III scepticism

  2009cited by this paper
• Perceptual Justification and Warrant by Default

  2009cited by this paper
• Reflective Knowledge: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge

  2009cited by this paper
• Reasoning: On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme

  2008cited by this paper
• Prcis of Knowledge and Practical Interests

  2007cited by this paper
• Entitlement and rationality

  2007cited by this paper
• Beyond Justification: Dimensions of Epistemic Evaluation

  2006cited by this paper
• Knowledge and lotteries

  2005cited by this paper
• Knowledge and Practical Interests

  2005cited by this paper
• Wittgenstein's on Certainty and Contemporary Anti-Scepticism

  2005cited by this paper
• I—Crispin Wright: Warrant for Nothing (and Foundations for Free)?

  2004cited by this paper
• WARRANT FOR NOTHING (AND FOUNDATIONS FOR FREE)?

  2004cited by this paper
• Evidence, Pragmatics, and Justification

  2002cited by this paper
• Articulating Reasons

  2000cited by this paper
• Making It Explicit

  1994cited by this paper
• The Reliability Of Sense Perception

  1994cited by this paper
• Transcendental Arguments I

  1983cited by this paper
• Epistemic justification

  1981cited by this paper
• More on Givenness and Explanatory Coherence

  1979cited by this paper
• Fundamental questions of philosophy

  1979cited by this paper
• Science, perception, and reality

  1963cited by this paper
• The Critique of Practical Reason

  1949cited by this paper

• A hybrid framework for creating artificial intelligence-augmented systematic literature reviews

  2025cites this paper
• Are Normative Explanatory Reasons Fundamentally Distinct from Normative Justificatory Reasons? A Critique of Logins’s Erotetic View of Reasons

  2025cites this paper
• Brunero’s Non-Normative Disjunctivism and Means-Ends Reasoning

  2025cites this paper
• The Manipulation Argument and a Kantian account of freedom

  2024cites this paper
• The Authority and Content of Morality: A Dilemma for Constitutivism and a Coherentist Approach to Normativity

  2023cites this paper
• Levine on Brandom’s Account of Objectivity

  2022influential citation
• Knowledge as Objectively Justified Belief

  2021cites this paper