Assessing semantic coherence and logical fallacies in joint probability estimates

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2010

• Venue

  Behavior Research Methods

• Publication date

  2010-05-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Philosophy, Computer Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.3758/BRM.42.2.373PMID 20479169
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Semantic coherence and fallacies in estimating joint probabilities.

  2010influential reference
• Précis of Bayesian Rationality: The Probabilistic Approach to Human Reasoning

  2009cited by this paper
• New paradigm psychology of reasoning

  2009cited by this paper
• Potential Moral Stigma and Reactions to Sexually Transmitted Diseases: Evidence for a Disjunction Fallacy

  2007cited by this paper
• Converging evidence supports fuzzy-trace theory's nested sets hypothesis, but not the frequency hypothesis

  2007cited by this paper
• Hypothetical Thinking: Dual Processes in Reasoning and Judgement

  2007cited by this paper
• Coherence and Correspondence Criteria for Rationality: Experts' Estimation of Risks of Sexually Transmitted Infections.

  2005cited by this paper
• Fuzzy‐Trace Theory, Risk Communication, and Product Labeling in Sexually Transmitted Diseases

  2003cited by this paper
• The influence of hierarchy on probability judgment.

  2003cited by this paper
• An Empirical Test of the Relative Validity of Expert and Lay Judgments of Risk

  2002cited by this paper
• Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment

  2002cited by this paper
• Distinguishing genuine from spurious causes: a coherence hypothesis.

  2000cited by this paper
• Coherence and correspondence theories in judgment and decision making.

  2000cited by this paper
• Cross-Cultural Variations in Probability Judgment Accuracy: Beyond General Knowledge Overconfidence?

  1998cited by this paper
• Information seeking on Bayesian conditional probability problems: A fuzzy‐trace theory account

  1995cited by this paper
• Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis

  1995cited by this paper
• How alike is it versus how likely is it: A disjunction fallacy in probability judgments.

  1993cited by this paper
• Calibration and probability judgements: Conceptual and methodological issues

  1991cited by this paper
• Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment

  1983cited by this paper
• CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE How People Make Decisions That Involve Risk A Dual-Processes Approach

  year unknowncited by this paper

• Understanding Genetic Breast Cancer Risk: Processing Loci of the BRCA Gist Intelligent Tutoring System.

  2016cites this paper
• Active engagement in a web-based tutorial to prevent obesity grounded in Fuzzy-Trace Theory predicts higher knowledge and gist comprehension

  2016cites this paper
• Clinicians’ Perceptions of the Benefits and Harms of Prostate and Colorectal Cancer Screening

  2015cites this paper
• Proficiency of FPPI and objective numeracy in assessing breast cancer risk estimation

  2015cites this paper
• Are People Naïve Probability Theorists? A Further Examination of the Probability Theory + Variation Model

  2014cites this paper
• Cancer Screening Benefits and Harms: News Coverage and Provider Perceptions

  2014cites this paper
• Communicating Numerical Risk: Human Factors That Aid Understanding in Health Care.

  2013cites this paper
• Semantic Coherence and Inconsistency in Estimating Conditional Probabilities

  2013influential citation
• Improving Internal Consistency in Conditional Probability Estimation With an Intelligent Tutoring System and Web-Based Tutorials

  2012influential citation
• Assessing semantic coherence in conditional probability estimates

  2011influential citation