Correction to ‘Personality composition is more important than group size in determining collective foraging behaviour in the wild’

The first author of ‘Personality composition is more important than group size in determining collective foraging behaviour in the wild’ (https://doi.org/10. 1098/rspb.2014.1424) recently discovered a series of errors in the raw data associated with this manuscript. In February 2014, these data were collected jointly by Keiser and Pruitt who recorded behavioural data daily into shared notebooks. One of these notebooks has been retained by Keiser, from which the majority of the data can be cross-validated. Working with a group of editors at Proceedings B, we discovered the following errors in the dataset used for analyses and subsequently uploaded to the Dryad Digital Repository [1]:

• Publication year

  2020

• Venue

  Proceedings of the Royal Society B

• Publication date

  2020-06-10

• Fields of study

  Biology, Medicine, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1098/rspb.2020.1164PMID 32517619PMCID PMC7341923
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Warring arthropod societies: Social spider colonies can delay annihilation by predatory ants via reduced apparency and increased group size.

  2015cited by this paper
• Personality composition is more important than group size in determining collective foraging behaviour in the wild

  2014influential reference

• Population differences in the aggregation and collective foraging behavior of fragmented social spider colonies

  2023cites this paper
• Divergent foraging strategies between populations of sympatric matrilineal killer whales

  2023cites this paper
• Hunger state and not personality determines task participation in a spider society

  2022cites this paper
• Group composition of individual personalities alters social network structure in experimental populations of forked fungus beetles

  2022cites this paper
• Extended phenotypes can underlie trade-offs: a case of social spiders

  2022cites this paper
• Effects of group composition on social foraging in cattle: inclusion of a leader cow in replacement of a follower facilitates expansion of grazing distribution patterns of beef cows

  2021cites this paper
• Apport d’une étude transcriptomique et comportementale aux connaissances de l’impact des obstacles aquatiques sur les anguillettes migrantes

  2021cites this paper
• Effects of group composition on social foraging in cattle: inclusion of a leader cow in replacement of a follower facilitates expansion of grazing distribution patterns of beef cows

  2021cites this paper
• Foraging dynamics of social insect colonies with resource constraints in random environments

  2021cites this paper
• The dominant seagrass herbivore Sarpa salpa shifts its shoaling and feeding strategies as they grow

  2020cites this paper
• Flock-dependent exploitation of a limited resource in House Sparrow

  2020cites this paper
• Reactive and pre-emptive spatial cohesion in a social primate

  2020cites this paper
• Physical and social cues shape nest-site preference and prey capture behavior in social spiders.

  2020cites this paper
• Colony size, nestmate density and social history shape behavioural variation in Formica fusca colonies

  2020cites this paper
• Oil exposure alters social group cohesion in fish

  2019cites this paper
• Intra- versus intergroup variance in collective behavior

  2019cites this paper
• Collective personalities: present knowledge and new frontiers

  2019cites this paper
• Early ontogenic emergence of personality and its long-term persistence in a social spider

  2019cites this paper
• Experimental evidence of frequency-dependent selection on group behaviour

  2019cites this paper
• Boldness at the nest predicts foraging and diving behaviour of female but not male African penguins

  2019cites this paper
• Resting networks and personality predict attack speed in social spiders

  2019cites this paper
• Conformity in the collective: differences in hunger affect individual and group behavior in a shoaling fish

  2019cites this paper
• Predictors of colony extinction vary by habitat type in social spiders

  2019cites this paper
• Behavioral responses vary with prey species in the social spider, Stegodyphus sarasinorum

  2019cites this paper
• Does personality affect competition, social organization, and fitness? a study using a small social mammal, Octodon degus

  2019cites this paper
• Individual variation in queen morphology and behavior predicts colony performance in the wild

  2019cites this paper
• Game of webs: species and web structure influence contest outcome in black widow spiders

  2019cites this paper
• Collective behaviour is not robust to disturbance, yet parent and offspring colonies resemble each other in social spiders

  2019cites this paper
• Field study of the relationship between personality and reproductive strategy in the White‐collared Blackbird Turdus albocinctus

  2019cites this paper
• Partner’s age, not social environment, predicts extrapair paternity in wild great tits (Parus major)

  2019cites this paper
• Personality and social foraging tactic use in free-living Eurasian tree sparrows (Passer montanus)

  2019cites this paper
• Assessing the repeatability, robustness to disturbance, and parent–offspring colony resemblance of collective behavior

  2019cites this paper
• Variation in neophobia among cliff swallows at different colonies

  2019cites this paper
• The influence of maternal care duration on offspring phenotypes in African cichlids

  2019cites this paper
• Collective aggressiveness of an ecosystem engineer is associated with coral recovery

  2018cites this paper
• Personality interacts with habitat quality to govern individual mortality and dispersal patterns

  2018cites this paper
• Body condition and food shapes group dispersal but not solitary dispersal in a social spider

  2018cites this paper
• The primary case is not enough: Variation among individuals, groups and social networks modify bacterial transmission dynamics

  2018cites this paper
• Group size, communication, and familiarity effects in foraging human teams

  2018cites this paper
• Selection for Collective Aggressiveness Favors Social Susceptibility in Social Spiders.

  2018cites this paper
• Emigration dynamics of cockroaches under different disturbance regimes do not depend on individual personalities

  2017cites this paper
• Impacts of worker density in colony-level aggression, expansion, and survival of the acacia-ant Crematogaster mimosae.

  2017cites this paper
• Social spiders: mildly successful social animals with much untapped research potential

  2017cites this paper
• Social structure modulates the evolutionary consequences of social plasticity: A social network perspective on interacting phenotypes

  2017cites this paper
• Effects of the group’s mix of sizes and personalities on the emergence of alternative mating systems in water striders

  2017cites this paper
• GROUP COMPOSITION IN SOCIAL SPIDERS: COLLECTIVE BEHAVIOR, KEYSTONE INDIVIDUALS, AND BACTERIAL TRANSMISSION DYNAMICS

  2016cites this paper
• The Effect of Keystone Individuals on Collective Outcomes Can Be Mediated through Interactions or Behavioral Persistence

  2016cites this paper
• Cuticular bacteria appear detrimental to social spiders in mixed but not monoculture exposure

  2016cites this paper
• Predator–prey interactions mediated by prey personality and predator hunting mode

  2016cites this paper
• Modification du comportement exploratoire et des capacités de navigation du crapaud commun en paysage fragmenté

  2015cites this paper
• Collective resilience in a disturbed environment: stability of the activity rhythm and group personality in Periplaneta americana

  2015cites this paper
• The legacy effects of keystone individuals on collective behaviour scale to how long they remain within a group

  2015cites this paper
• Etude de la variation génétique et de la plasticité des comportements sociaux chez la drosophile

  2015cites this paper