Comparing and Predicting Inconsistency on Positive and Negative Life Experiences Reports: Which Variables Matter?

Most studies about life experiences and their long-term impact have relied on retrospective assessments and cross-sectional designs. However, there are concerns about the inconsistency of reports, which have been addressed in a limited scope. This study aimed to compare differences on inconsistency between positive and negative experiences to describe potential patterns and to identify sociodemographic, experiences-related and design-related predictors of inconsistency. Adults from community (N = 171) reported their life experiences twice, through self-report or interview. An overall trend of overreporting was found for positive and negative experiences. Additionally, inconsistency on positive experiences was higher than on negative although both variables were correlated. Regarding predictors of inconsistency, the model explained greater variance for negative experiences than for the positive ones. Nevertheless, most variables did not predict inconsistency, with few exceptions: impact for positive experiences, total of experiences for negative experiences, and time interval was marginally significant for both. Available data comparing inconsistency on positive and negative experiences as well as associated predictors are incipient. Overall, it seems that we know more about variables not involved in inconsistency than those that matter. Due to its relevancy, this issue should be further examined.

• Publication year

  2022

• Venue

  The social science

• Publication date

  2022-02-08

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.3390/socsci11020061
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Inconsistent reporting of life experiences: What people think and how they explain it?

  2021cited by this paper
• Lifetime Experiences Scale (LIFES): Development and validation in community samples

  2020cited by this paper
• What is told when the story is retold? Consistency of victimization reports in psychiatric patients.

  2018cited by this paper
• Life Experiences Throughout the Lifespan: What Do People Say (or Not) About Them?

  2017cited by this paper
• Gender, negative life events and coping on different stages of depression severity: A cross-sectional study among Chinese university students.

  2017cited by this paper
• The importance of post hoc approaches for overcoming non-response and attrition bias in population-sampled studies

  2015cited by this paper
• Retrospective Reports of Negative Early Life Events Over a 4-Year Period: A Test of Measurement Invariance and Response Consistency

  2015cited by this paper
• Assessment of the quality of the childhood physical abuse measure in the National Population Health Survey.

  2015cited by this paper
• Inconsistent retrospective self-reports of childhood sexual abuse and their correlates in the general population

  2014cited by this paper
• Assessing the Reliability of Retrospective Reports of Adverse Childhood Experiences among Adolescents with Documented Childhood Maltreatment

  2014cited by this paper
• Development, Use, and Psychometric Properties of the Trauma History Questionnaire

  2011cited by this paper
• Positive life events and mood disorders: longitudinal evidence for an erratic lifecourse hypothesis.

  2010cited by this paper
• Stability and change in retrospective reports of childhood experiences over a 5-year period: findings from the Davis Longitudinal Study.

  2009cited by this paper
• Reliability of Self-Reported Childhood Physical Abuse by Adults and Factors Predictive of Inconsistent Reporting

  2009cited by this paper
• Reliability issues in longitudinal research

  2008cited by this paper
• Identification of child maltreatment using prospective and self-report methodologies: a comparison of maltreatment incidence and relation to later psychopathology.

  2008cited by this paper
• Reliability of Retrospective Assessments of Childhood Experiences in Germany

  2006cited by this paper
• Inconsistency in reporting potentially traumatic events

  2006cited by this paper
• Consistency of retrospective reports of DSM-IV criterion A traumatic stressors among substance use disorder patients.

  2005cited by this paper
• The importance of retrospective findings in child maltreatment research.

  2004cited by this paper
• Adverse childhood experiences and the risk of depressive disorders in adulthood.

  2004cited by this paper
• Validity of adult retrospective reports of adverse childhood experiences: review of the evidence.

  2004cited by this paper
• The case for prospective longitudinal studies in child maltreatment research: commentary on Dube, Williamson, Thompson, Felitti, and Anda (2004).

  2004cited by this paper
• Assessing the reliability of retrospective reports of adverse childhood experiences among adult HMO members attending a primary care clinic.

  2004cited by this paper
• Stability of retrospective reports in depression: traumatic events, past depressive episodes, and parental psychopathology.

  2002cited by this paper
• Events and subjective well-being: only recent events matter.

  1996cited by this paper
• Methodological issues in the assessment of life events: A review of issues and research

  1983cited by this paper
• Life changes. Do people really remember?

  1979cited by this paper
• The Social Readjustment Rating Scale.

  1967cited by this paper

• Record of the past or reflection of the present? Fluctuations in recollections of childhood adversity and fluctuations in adult relationship circumstances.

  2026cites this paper
• Reliability of Positive and Negative Life Experiences Reported by Inmates: A Pilot Study

  2025influential citation
• Sexual abuse among Mozambican women at risk for HIV/AIDS infection: The temporal stability of self‐report

  2025cites this paper