Socialno-ekonomske in okoljske značilnosti regionalnega razvoja Slovenije po letu 2010

Zmanjševanje regionalnih razvojnih razlik in uravnotežen razvoj, temelječ na načelih trajnostnega razvoja, sta osrednja cilja regionalne politike v Sloveniji, zato v članku preučujemo uspešnost slovenskih regij pri doseganju teh ciljev na socialno-ekonomskem in okoljskem področju po letu 2010. V ta namen so bili preučeni štirje sintezni kazalniki (bruto domači proizvod na prebivalca, ekološki odtis na prebivalca, indeks razvojne ogroženosti in kazalnik trajnostnega regionalnega razvoja) in 32 posameznih ekonomskih, socialnih in okoljskih kazalnikov, ki so vključeni tudi v izračun kazalnika trajnostnega regionalnega razvoja. Večina ekonomskih in socialnih kazalnikov kaže približevanje strateškim razvojnim ciljem, večina okoljskih pa oddaljevanje od njih.

• Publication year

  2021

• Venue

  Dela

• Publication date

  2021-12-30

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.4312/dela.56.53-87
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Trends in regional development in Slovenia in the light of the goals of sustainable development

  2021influential reference
• Hidden linkages between resources and economy: A “Beyond-GDP” approach using alternative welfare indicators

  2020cited by this paper
• Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: An Appeal of Global Cooperation for Building Green Civilization

  2020cited by this paper
• Regional differences in Slovenia from the viewpoint of achieving Europe’s sustainable development

  2018cited by this paper
• A good life for all within planetary boundaries

  2018cited by this paper
• Questioning the Ecological Footprint

  2016cited by this paper
• Is Decoupling GDP Growth from Environmental Impact Possible?

  2016cited by this paper
• A Review of the Ecological Footprint Indicator—Perceptions and Methods

  2010cited by this paper
• The GDP paradox

  2009cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.