PURPOSE This study compared the self-reported and parent-reported memory of children with epilepsy across time and explored the relationships between these measures of subjective memory and the children's actual performance on objective neuropsychological tests. METHOD One-hundred and nineteen children with epilepsy who were surgical candidates underwent comprehensive neuropsychological testing that included the Everyday Verbal Memory Questionnaire (EVMQ). Each child's parent and 82 of the children themselves completed the appropriate version of this subjective memory measure. After 9 months, the children returned for a second neuropsychological evaluation with 71 parents and 39 children completing the same questionnaire. Approximately one-third of the children in the study underwent surgery between the two evaluations. Standardized regression-based norms were used to quantify change in cognitive abilities across assessments. RESULTS Results revealed significant relationships between parent reports and child reports of the children's memory abilities. Parent reports, but not child reports, correlated with the children's objective test scores at baseline. In contrast, children were more attuned to changes in their memory across time. CONCLUSIONS These findings demonstrate the importance of considering both parent and child perceptions of everyday cognitive functioning when evaluating cognition and cognitive changes over time in pediatric patients with epilepsy.
Mother knows best… or does she? Perceptions of the memory abilities of pediatric patients with epilepsy as reported by patients and their parents across time.
T. Lineweaver,Abbey N Collins,M. Stopa,Madison Horth,Megan E. Fishbaugh,J. Haut,Lisa Ferguson,P. Klaas,Deepak Lachhwani,W. Bingaman,R. Busch
Published 2022 in Epilepsy & Behavior
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2022
- Venue
Epilepsy & Behavior
- Publication date
2022-02-16
- Fields of study
Medicine
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-27 of 27 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-4 of 4 citing papers · Page 1 of 1