Comparison of a resin-based sealant with a nano-filled flowable resin composite on sealing performance of marginal defects in resin composites restorations: a 36-months clinical evaluation

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2022

• Venue

  Clinical Oral Investigations

• Publication date

  2022-05-24

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Materials Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s00784-022-04557-zPMID 35608683
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Retention of flowable composite resins in comparison to pit and fissure sealants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

  2020cited by this paper
• Sealing of restorations with marginal defects does not affect their longevity.

  2018cited by this paper
• Effects of Sealing Marginal Occlusal Defects of Composite Restorations with a Nanofiller-Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite: A Double-Blind, Randomised Clinical Trial with One-Year Follow-Up.

  2018cited by this paper
• Repair may increase survival of direct posterior restorations - A practice based study.

  2017cited by this paper
• The Use of Pit and Fissure Sealants—A Literature Review

  2017cited by this paper
• Models of Caries Formation around Dental Composite Restorations

  2017cited by this paper
• Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants: A report of the American Dental Association and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry.

  2016cited by this paper
• Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guideline for the Use of Pit-and-Fissure Sealants.

  2016cited by this paper
• Fissure sealant materials: Wear resistance of flowable composite resins

  2016cited by this paper
• Seal, replacement or monitoring amalgam restorations with occlusal marginal defects? Results of a 10-year clinical trial.

  2015cited by this paper
• Sealing composite with defective margins, good care or over treatment? Results of a 10-year clinical trial.

  2015cited by this paper
• Resin-based pit-and-fissure sealants: microleakage reduction and infiltration enhancement using a bonding agent.

  2015cited by this paper
• Repair or replacement of restorations: A prospective cohort study by dentists in The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

  2015cited by this paper
• Secondary Caries Development in in situ Gaps next to Composite and Amalgam

  2015cited by this paper
• Use of guidelines to improve the quality and transparency of reporting oral health research.

  2015cited by this paper
• longevity of Posterior composite restorations: A systematic review and Meta-analysis

  2014cited by this paper
• Gap Size and Wall Lesion Development Next to Composite

  2014cited by this paper
• Longevity of Posterior Composite Restorations

  2014cited by this paper
• Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study.

  2014cited by this paper
• Do socioeconomic determinants affect the quality of posterior dental restorations? A multilevel approach.

  2013cited by this paper
• Minimal invasive treatment for defective restorations: five-year results using sealants.

  2013influential reference
• Patient Risk Factors’ Influence on Survival of Posterior Composites

  2013cited by this paper
• Longevity of materials for pit and fissure sealing--results from a meta-analysis.

  2012cited by this paper
• Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials.

  2012cited by this paper
• Survival rate of sealed, refurbished and repaired defective restorations: 4-year follow-up.

  2011cited by this paper
• FDI World Dental Federation - clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations. Update and clinical examples.

  2010cited by this paper
• Retention of a Flowable Composite Resin in Comparison to a Conventional Resin-Based Sealant: One-year Follow-up

  2010cited by this paper
• FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations—update and clinical examples

  2010influential reference
• Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial.

  2008cited by this paper
• In vitro evaluation of microleakage of different materials used as pit-and-fissure sealants.

  2006cited by this paper
• Reprint of Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials

  2005cited by this paper
• Evaluation of a computer-based caries risk assessment program in an elderly group of individuals

  2003cited by this paper
• World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

  2002cited by this paper
• Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

  2001cited by this paper

• The effect of the use of the deproteinization agent hypochlorous acid and two different pit and fissure sealant self-adhesive flowable composites upon its bonding with the enamel.

  2024cites this paper
• A randomized clinical study evaluating the 30-month clinical performance of class II indirect restorations in endodontically treated teeth using ceramic, hybrid, and composite computer-aided design/computer-aided production blocks

  2024cites this paper
• Effect of thiol compound on the dentin bond strength when using experimental one-bottle self-etch adhesive system

  2024cites this paper
• Annual review of selected scientific literature: A report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry.

  2023cites this paper
• Patients´ satisfaction concerning direct anterior dental restoration

  2023cites this paper
• Influence of silver nanoparticles on the resin-dentin bond strength and antibacterial activity of a self-etch adhesive system.

  2022cites this paper