Evaluating primary care follow-up of breast cancer: methods and preliminary results of three studies.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  1995

• Venue

  Annals of Oncology

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1093/ANNONC/6.SUPPL_2.S47PMID 8547197
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Specialist and general practice views on routine follow-up of breast cancer patients in general practice.

  1995cited by this paper
• Intensive diagnostic follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer. A randomized trial. National Research Council Project on Breast Cancer follow-up.

  1994cited by this paper
• Impact of follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. A multicenter randomized controlled trial. The GIVIO Investigators.

  1994cited by this paper
• Intensive Diagnostic Follow-up After Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer: A Randomized Trial

  1994cited by this paper
• Survey of family physicians: what is their role in cancer patient care?

  1994cited by this paper
• The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS?

  1993cited by this paper
• Routine follow-up of patients after primary therapy for early breast cancer: changing concepts and challenges for the future.

  1993cited by this paper
• Systemic treatment of early breast cancer by hormonal, cytotoxic, or immune therapy: 133 randomised trials involving 31 000 recurrences and 24 000 deaths among 75 000 women

  1992cited by this paper
• Breast cancer (1)

  1992cited by this paper
• Postoperative follow‐up of patients with early breast cancer. Patterns of care among clinical oncologists and a review of the literature

  1991cited by this paper
• A minimalist policy for breast cancer surveillance.

  1991cited by this paper
• Against minimalism in breast cancer follow-up.

  1991cited by this paper
• Continuity of care: Development and implementation of a shared patient data base

  1989cited by this paper
• A modular approach to quality-of-life assessment in cancer clinical trials.

  1988cited by this paper
• Screening for recurrent breast cancer--its effectiveness and prognostic value.

  1987cited by this paper
• An evaluation of routine follow‐up for detection of breast cancer recurrences

  1987cited by this paper
• Family physicians' perspective of patient care at the london regional cancer clinic.

  1987cited by this paper
• Early Detection of Breast Cancer Recurrences through Periodic follow-up - is it Useless?

  1985cited by this paper
• Value of routine follow up of women treated for early carcinoma of the breast.

  1985cited by this paper
• Is Follow up of Patients after Surgery for Breast Cancer Worthwhile?

  1985cited by this paper
• Follow up of patients with breast cancer.

  1985cited by this paper
• Care of malignant disease in an urban practice.

  1985cited by this paper
• The general practitioner and information to cancer patients.

  1985cited by this paper
• Follow‐up of breast cancer patients

  1984cited by this paper
• The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

  1983cited by this paper
• Evaluation of follow-up methods to detect relapse after mastectomy in breast cancer patients

  1982cited by this paper
• Evaluation of routine follow-up after surgery for breast carcinoma.

  1982cited by this paper
• Management of patients after mastectomy.

  1981cited by this paper
• A consultant-extender system for breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy.

  1979cited by this paper

• Factors influencing the translation of shared cancer follow-up care into clinical practice: a systematic review

  2022cites this paper
• Consensus statement on the surveillance of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies

  2022cites this paper
• Breast Cancer Survivor Experience Of Rehabilitation Services In South Africa: Towards A Cancer Survivorship Plan

  2021cites this paper
• Follow-up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors.

  2019cites this paper
• SCORE: Shared care of Colorectal cancer survivors: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

  2017cites this paper
• Follow-up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors.

  2016cites this paper
• Breast Cancer Clinical Guidelines

  2016cites this paper
• Place du médecin généraliste dans la surveillance des patientes atteintes d'un cancer du sein : enquête de pratique dans le département de la Haute-Savoie

  2016cites this paper
• Survivorship care plans for people with colorectal cancer: do they reflect the research evidence?

  2016cites this paper
• The on-going care of patients with cancer: what is the appropriate balance of cancer care between specialists and primary care?

  2015cites this paper
• Prologue: Surviving Cancer: SEER Statistics

  2014cites this paper
• ‘What happens next?’ An exploration of how general practitioners talk to men presenting with possible symptoms of prostate cancer

  2013cites this paper
• Adult Cancer Survivors Discuss Follow-up in Primary Care: ‘Not What I Want, But Maybe What I Need’

  2012cites this paper
• Follow up after breast cancer -- views of Australian women.

  2011cites this paper
• Professionals' opinion on follow-up in breast cancer patients; perceived purpose and influence of patients' risk factors.

  2011cites this paper
• BREAST CANCER CLINICAL GUIDELINES

  2011cites this paper
• The interface between primary and oncology specialty care: treatment through survivorship.

  2010cites this paper
• Survivorship: adult cancer survivors.

  2009cites this paper
• Investigations after adjuvant therapy.

  2009cites this paper
• post-treatment follow-up

  2009cites this paper
• Fuel, beds, meals and meds: Out-of-pocket expenses for patients with cancer in rural Queensland

  2009cites this paper
• Implementing a survivorship care plan for patients with breast cancer.

  2008cites this paper
• Care of the Cancer Survivor

  2008cites this paper
• Follow-up strategies in gynecological oncology: searching appropriateness

  2007cites this paper
• Questioning specialists' attitudes to breast cancer follow-up in primary care.

  2007cites this paper
• Surveillance after Primary Therapy

  2007cites this paper
• From cancer patient to cancer survivor : lost in transition

  2006cites this paper
• Randomized trial of long-term follow-up for early-stage breast cancer: a comparison of family physician versus specialist care.

  2006cites this paper
• Effectiveness of Follow-Up for Breast Cancer Patients

  2006cites this paper
• A survey of physicians' views on the Saskatchewan cancer agency's follow-by-mail program

  2006cites this paper
• Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: 9. Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer (2005 update)

  2005cites this paper
• Family physicians' perspectives on practice guidelines related to cancer control

  2004cites this paper
• Quality o f N on-Breast C ancer H ealth M aintenance A mong Elderly B reast C ancer S urvivors

  2003cites this paper
• The Experience of Waiting and Life During Breast Cancer Follow-Up

  2003cites this paper
• Quality of non-breast cancer health maintenance among elderly breast cancer survivors.

  2003cites this paper
• Cancer physicians' attitudes toward colorectal cancer follow-up.

  2003cites this paper
• Surveillance mammography after treatment of primary breast cancer: a systematic review.

  2002cites this paper
• Publications: Professor Martin Vessey

  2001cites this paper
• Doc, shouldn't we be getting some tests?".

  2000cites this paper
• Follow up after primary treatment: curable diseases primarily treated with surgery.

  2000cites this paper
• Preventive health care, 1999 update: 3. Follow-up after breast cancer. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

  1999cites this paper
• Comparison of breast cancer patient satisfaction with follow-up in primary care versus specialist care: results from a randomized controlled trial.

  1999cites this paper
• Do specialists do it better? The impact of specialization on the processes and outcomes of care for cancer patients.

  1998cites this paper
• Patients' views of routine hospital follow‐up: a qualitative study of women with breast cancer in remission

  1998influential citation
• When and how to discharge cancer survivors in long term remission from follow-up: the effectiveness of a contract.

  1997cites this paper
• Costs and benefits of routine follow-up after curative treatment for endometrial cancer.

  1997cites this paper
• Management of primary breast cancer.

  1996cites this paper
• A survey in Puglia: the attitudes and opinions of specialists, general physicians and patients on follow-up practice. G.S.Bio.Ca.M.

  1995cites this paper
• Bulletin on the effectiveness of health service interventions for decision makers

  year unknowncites this paper
• Bulletin on the effectiveness of health service interventions for decision makers

  year unknowncites this paper
• Management ofprimary breast cancer HORMONE THERAPY Tamoxifen can improve survival

  year unknowncites this paper