The Bioethicist Who Cried “Synthetic Biology”: An Analysis of the Function of Bioterrorism Predictions in Bioethics

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2017

• Venue

  Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

• Publication date

  2017-03-31

• Fields of study

  Biology, Medicine, Philosophy

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1017/S0963180116000827PMID 28361720
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies

  2017cited by this paper
• No time to waste—the ethical challenges created by CRISPR

  2015cited by this paper
• Viral bioterrorism: Learning the lesson of Ebola virus in West Africa 2013-2015.

  2015cited by this paper
• Synthetic Biology and Biosecurity: Challenging the “Myths”

  2014cited by this paper
• H5N1 avian flu research and the ethics of knowledge.

  2013cited by this paper
• Ethical Theory for "Dual-Use" Dilemmas in Synthetic Biology

  2012cited by this paper
• Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement

  2012cited by this paper
• Synthetic biology and the ethics of knowledge

  2010cited by this paper
• Diffusion of synthetic biology: a challenge to biosafety

  2008cited by this paper
• Ethical and Philosophical Consideration of the Dual-use Dilemma in the Biological Sciences

  2007cited by this paper
• High hopes and automatic escalators: a critique of some new arguments in bioethics

  2007cited by this paper
• Reply to Sandin: The Paradox of Precaution Is Not Dispelled by Attention to Context

  2006cited by this paper
• Catastrophe: Risk and Response

  2004cited by this paper
• Biosecurity: Responsible Stewardship of Bioscience in an Age of Catastrophic Terrorism

  2003cited by this paper
• The Economic Effects of the 1918 Influenza Epidemic

  2003cited by this paper
• New life forms: new threats, new possibilities.

  2003cited by this paper
• Extending human lifespan and the precautionary paradox.

  2002cited by this paper
• Aum Shinrikyo's Biological Weapons Program: Why Did it Fail?

  2001cited by this paper
• Precautionary principle stifles discovery

  1999cited by this paper
• Down the slippery slope: arguing in applied ethics

  1993cited by this paper
• The Value of Wilderness

  1979cited by this paper
• Restriction of research with recombinant DNA: the dangers of inquiry and the burden of proof.

  1978cited by this paper
• Research in a Box

  1977cited by this paper
• Terror on a grand scale

  1976cited by this paper
• Taking Sides in Philosophy

  1937cited by this paper
• Influenza : the Mother of All Pandemics

  year unknowncited by this paper

• The view of synthetic biology in the field of ethics: a thematic systematic review

  2024cites this paper
• Biosafety, biosecurity, and bioethics

  2024cites this paper
• Overstatements and Understatements in the Debate on Synthetic Biology, Bioterrorism and Ethics

  2021cites this paper
• A CONFLICTED RELATIONSHIP

  2020cites this paper
• Iran’s Biotechnology Needs to Cross of Bioethics Debates Lags

  2019cites this paper
• Existential risks: a philosophical analysis

  2019cites this paper
• Finding Hope in Synthetic Biology

  2017cites this paper
• WP8 Novel Threats WP8.1: State of the art of Synthetic Biology-Literature Review

  year unknowncites this paper