Psychometric properties of a short self-report measure of rule-breaking behaviour among adolescents: findings from the Ungdata survey

Background: The aim of the present study was to examine the factor structure and reliability of a six-item scale of rule-breaking behaviour, and to test for measurement invariance across gender, age, survey year and geographical location. Methods: Data were from three yearly cross-sectional and population-based collections of the Ungdata surveys (2017 to 2019) including a total of 297,102 Norwegian adolescents aged approximately 13 to 19 years. Measurements included respondent’s rule-breaking behaviour, time, gender, age and geographical location. Results: Confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated that a one-factor solution of the rule-breaking behaviour scale had good fit to data (comparative fit index 0.98; Tucker–Lewis index 0.96; root mean square error of approximation 0.049 (95% confidence interval 0.048, 0.050)), with factor loadings ranging from 0.60 to 0.81 for all items (mean factor loading 0.72). Similar results were found across survey years for both genders. Several multiple group confirmatory factor analyses showed indications of measurement invariance for the scale across gender, age groups, geographical locations and survey years. The ordinal alpha and omega coefficients for internal consistency of the scale were both 0.86. Conclusions: The six-item scale for self-reported rule-breaking behaviour demonstrated good psychometric properties and appears to constitute a reliable measure of adolescent rule-breaking behaviour for use in population-based surveys in a Norwegian setting.

• Publication year

  2022

• Venue

  Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

• Publication date

  2022-07-07

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1177/14034948221104650PMID 35799454
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Past Year Cannabis Use Among Norwegian Adolescents: Time Trends Based on the Ungdata Surveys 2010–2019

  2021cited by this paper
• Scale length does matter: Recommendations for measurement invariance testing with categorical factor analysis and item response theory approaches

  2020influential reference
• Fitting Ordinal Factor Analysis Models With Missing Data: A Comparison Between Pairwise Deletion and Multiple Imputation

  2020influential reference
• Multiple-Group Invariance with Categorical Outcomes Using Updated Guidelines: An Illustration Using Mplus and the lavaan/semTools Packages

  2020cited by this paper
• Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices.

  2016cited by this paper
• EFPA REVIEW MODEL FOR THE DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL AND EDUCATIONAL TESTS

  2013influential reference
• Is relational aggression part of the externalizing spectrum? a bifactor model of youth antisocial behavior.

  2013cited by this paper
• Mindre problematferd for de fleste, større problemer for de få? En studie av tidstrender i problematferd: 1992, 2002 og 2010

  2012cited by this paper
• How do we optimally conceptualize the heterogeneity within antisocial behavior? An argument for aggressive versus non-aggressive behavioral dimensions.

  2012influential reference
• Age-of-Onset or Behavioral Sub-Types? A Prospective Comparison of Two Approaches to Characterizing the Heterogeneity within Antisocial Behavior

  2011cited by this paper
• Developmental origins of disruptive behaviour problems: the 'original sin' hypothesis, epigenetics and their consequences for prevention.

  2010cited by this paper
• Multivariate Data Analysis

  2007influential reference
• A developmental propensity model of the origins of conduct problems during childhood and adolescence.

  2003cited by this paper
• The Validity of a Self-reported Delinquency Scale

  2002cited by this paper
• Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance

  2002influential reference
• Adolescent antisocial behavior and substance use: longitudinal analyses.

  2002cited by this paper
• Childhood predictors differentiate life-course persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways among males and females

  2001cited by this paper
• Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

  1999cited by this paper
• Sex differences in the etiology of aggressive and nonaggressive antisocial behavior: results from two twin studies.

  1999cited by this paper
• Measurement of antisocial behaviour in early adolescence and adolescence: psychometric properties and substantive findings

  1999cited by this paper
• Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy.

  1993influential reference
• A longitudinal study of antisocial behaviors in early adolescence as predictors of late adolescent substance use: gender and ethnic group differences.

  1990cited by this paper
• Reassessing the reliability and validity of self-report delinquency measures

  1986cited by this paper
• Reconciling race and class differences in self-reported and official estimates of delinquency.

  1980cited by this paper

• Exploring Risk and Protective Factors for Suicidality and Physical Self-Harm: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in Nordic Adolescents

  2025cites this paper
• Poor family finances, family-based adverse childhood experiences, and depressive and behavioral symptoms in adolescence

  2025cites this paper
• Do Municipal Contexts Matter for Adolescent Mental Health? A Within-Municipality Analysis of Nationwide Norwegian Survey Data Across Six Years

  2023influential citation
• Does Religiosity Matter? The Role of Subjective and Organizational Religiosity on Substance Use Among Adolescents

  2023cites this paper